STATUS:
'Friar Elias' and two other so-called seers 'Mother' Maria Shimani de
Monserrat and 'Sister' Lucia de Jesus from Salta Uruguay, are part of an ecumenical
community called the 'Grace Mercy Order' that bears no affiliation to
any
institutionalised religion, therefore, is not under obedience to the
Church. They run a site called: 'Voice and Echo of the Divine Messengers'
One
of Friar Elias' latest vision on the Three Days of Darkness also
promotes practises contrary to the teachings of the Church, and,
several of this videos feature New Age type cosmic 'mysto' babble
that show these visions aren't Catholic.
Here
are the red flags showing he and any mystic attached to him are a
fake:
:::::::::::::::
'Rogue',
'Lone Wolf', or maverick visionaries and orders:
Friar
Elias is part of a 'monastic' community that is ecumenical without
formal ties to any institutionalised religion and is not under the
authority of the Church. So, basically, they are fake religious.
A
visionary that refuses to submit to the authority of the Catholic
Church, attempts to set up an organisation, monastic or lay order or
foundation that is ecumenical and / or 'open to all religions' so it
is purposely not placed under the authority of the Church is a huge
sign of a fake.
A
true mystic always is submissive and obedient to the Church and
submits their order or the charters of their order to be considered
to the Church.
These
disobedient organisations are usually set up independently from the
Church so they can also rake in money and not have to submit to the
Church regarding tithes, or, even start a cult following, etc.
Moneymaking rackets are also a huge sign of a fake.
:::::::::::::::::
Encouraging
the practise to seek out your Guardian angel's name and invoke it-this is CONTRARY TO the CHURCH'S INSTRUCTIONS
“Our
Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “... and then you will call your guardian
angels (i.e. During the 3 Days of Darkness), even if you do not know
his name. If it were a necessary grace, you will know what your
guardian angel is called and so
you will invoke it so that it (your angel) may be close to you....”
Red
flag: To use angel names not revealed in Scripture, or, to make an
attempt to seek out your guardian angel's name is completely
discouraged by the Catholic Church. God reserves angel names to
Himself, so to try and found out their names has been discouraged by
the Church as you could actually be naming a demon. Click here to read more about that.
And,
this vision is outright wrong - it is NOT a necessary grace to know
our angel's name – we can still call upon and invoke them for the
same exact help not knowing their names. An untruth is a sign of a fake.
When
a vision attempts to say it is okay to seek out your guardian angel's
name, or God will permit it sometimes, then they are fake as a true
vision never promotes disobedience to the Church.
Also,
bad grammar – can't seem to stay either in past tense or future
tense – if it 'were a necessary grace' meaning it wasn't back then,
but then switching to 'you will know'. Proper language should be
'it will be a
necessary grace' – sounds like Heaven doesn't know what it is
talking about. Sign of a faker making it up as they go.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::
No
true ecstasy. From videos showing his 'visions' you can tell he is not in
ecstasy -- he is blinking, swallowing, etc. Looks like he is faking
up a vision as he goes.
:::::::::::::::::::
Using
Non-Catholic, Pagan or 'Pagan approving', 'New Age', 'Mother Earth'
spiritism type language
“Our
Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “That is why I come here to Ecuador ...
Today I come here to give you this special blessing for all your
people, for all your culture, for your original principles that were
so positive and good, for your origins and for your roots that must
continue to penetrate into the depths of the human consciousness
....”
This
harping back to 'all your culture' sounds like she's also saying
their indigenous pagan past was also equally good, as if a demon were
preparing the way for the Pachamama ritual that occurred at the
Vatican.
And,
Friar Elias' 'visions' constantly have the recurring term 'human
consciousness' or 'consciousness' when referring to the spirit, which
sounds so New Age. Also, 'essence' constantly pops up, as the
guardian angels protect “our essences” (Feb. 25, 2018) Again,
more New Age babble.
This
is a sign of a fake.
::::::::::::::::::::
Bad
grammar or nonsensical language in his vision:
Heaven
may use 'simple language', but Our Lord and the Mother of God know
how to speak properly and are coherent in their messages. They are
direct and to the point.
There
is a difference between Heaven wanting to repeat a message so we
don't forget, and when a visionary goes off rambling as if they
haven't a clue what they're talking about and makes contradictory or
repetitive statements that over qualify to the point the sentence is
nonsense. The latter is a sign something is being made up on the
spot, or, the mystic is making something up and hasn't a clue what
they're talking about.
Here's
an example:
“Our
Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “With the sweetness of your hearts today I
can be here and bring more graces to the world, not only for your
lives, but also for the planet which suffers in various parts of the
world without anyone knowing.”
The
section “which suffers in various parts of the world” is an
unnecessary and ridiculous restatement. We know she's talking about
the planet when she refers to it suffering, so why restate it again
with such nonsense grammar? Sounds like Friar Elias is making things
up off the cuff.
Another
example of nonsense and illogical statements:
“Our
Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “To be able today to say all these simple
but true things, I must remove evil from the surface of the planet
with the compelling and loving help of the Angels of God, under the
Celestial Command of the Archangel St. Michael.”
So,
Our Lady could not come and give her message that day unless St.
Michel removed all evil from the planet? I doubt Heaven stopped the
world from sinning right at that particular moment – sin was going
on for sure. And, why use the future tense 'I must'? Is she in the
present or the future? Again, sounds like she doesn't know what
she's talking about, a vision being manufactured off the cuff so to
speak.
:::::::::::::::::::
Strange
non-Catholic or unofficial titles for the Mother of God, especially
when they contradict Catholic teaching / theology
In
one part of the message of Feb. 25, 2018, Our Lady supposedly says:
“I am the Mother of the Sovereign Sceptre of God and with It cause
the Will of the Most High to descend to earth.”
A
theologian might have to check up on my assessment of this to see if
I'm on the right path, but I can see this is wrong.
The
'sceptre of God' mentioned in the Bible is symbolic of God's almighty
authority – Mary is Mother of the Son, but NOT of the Father.
Since authority comes from the Father too, she cannot be the 'mother'
of the Father's authority. She would have to be Mother of the Father
to be mother of His authority as well, and that would mean she was
higher than the Father.
Then,
if she is supposed to be referring to Christ as the 'Sceptre' as the
Father did hand all authority of Heaven and Earth to Him after all,
she is saying she has power over 'It' to bring the Will of the Most
High to Earth – here she is saying she has power over her Divine
Son, and will 'use' Him to bring His own Will to earth? Sounds like
a nonsense riddle here.
Also,
seems to be giving herself considerable powers over God Himself and
His Will when she of herself does not have divine power and is
herself a handmaid to God's Will as she said herself in the Bible
Another
example of “Our Lady” giving herself powers like God's is that
she says she 'redeems' souls, when it is Christ who redeems souls –
Mary at best "could" one day be called a co-redeemer, (but this is still a big question in the Church if she may be given this title), and even if she does receive this title one day, she cannot completely
redeem a soul as she claims to Friar Elias - that is something only Christ can do: (Feb, 25, 2018) “I draw
lost spirits to my heart, I redeem fallen consciences that they reach
redemption and peace'. So, this is sentence marks a major theological error.
Also,
a conscience cannot 'fall'. The conscience is the 'inner voice of
God within us' and is the knowledge of God's law and our duties that
we have attained through our human understanding and is a practical
act of the intellect that informs our actions. It is a sinner who
falls, the conscience is what informs their actions and warns if they
are good or bad and is an act of the intellect. Very strange Our
Lady says she “redeems fallen consciences”, giving herself divine
powers and talking as if she doesn't know what a conscience is.
So
there are several contradictions here showing signs of a fake.
::::::::::::::::::
Requesting
impossibilities that may hamper daily duties / mix-up of priorities
The
Church teaches daily duties come first, and both Heaven and the Church does not
demand impossibilities. A fake vision sometimes makes impossible
demands for graces of protection or similar graces that goes beyond
what can be accomplished according to daily duties in order to
discourage people and make them give up, or, fail in their daily
duties.
In
one message, the demand is for DAILY confession.
“Our
Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “Do not look for Jesus in the Eucharist,
but also in daily
confession, in
fasting, in prayer and above all, in the service of the poorest of
the poor.”
Very
few people have the luxury to be able to go daily to confession. Not
only do some parishes not have the resources to be that available to
their congregations, but how many living in the world can go daily to
confession due to necessary demands on their time? This is an
impossible request to make for the laity.
Also,
Satan is very good at getting us snow blinded with the wrong
perception or a mix up of priorities regarding the importance of good
deeds. Notice that serving the poor is put 'above all' in this
message, even before seeking Jesus in the Eucharist, when the Church
teaches the greatest good act one can do is to attend Mass, which
outweighs all fasting, alms giving, and mortifications, etc. Beware
of anything lessening devotion to the Blessed Sacrament or contradicting Church teachings.
::::::::::::::::::::
Contradicts
the vision of Marie-Julie Jahenny
I've
noticed this seem to have become the 'litmus test' of an authentic
mystic – if they contradict Marie-Julie Jahenny, there seems to be
a red flag.
Our
Lady tells Friar Elias that with prayer and living a good life as
requested that 'you' (meaning us) can make “this land a Promised
Land” (Feb. 25, 2018), when we know from Marie-Julie Jahenny that
only Christ will bring about this renewal and the Age of Peace: we
cannot expect it from any plans or actions of man, nor will we be
able to bring this about as the true faithful are going to become
very small. Yes, all we will have is prayer, but Christ Himself is
going to have to step in, send the chastisements and renew the earth
before every soul is lost Marie-Julie was told, the earth will have
become that corrupt.
:::::::::::::::::::
His
visions also contradicts Marie-Julie Jahenny's directions regarding
the Three Days of Darkness:
Marie-Julie
claims we are to kneel and pray during these three days of terror,
and, even pray prostrate on the ground to implore God's mercy during
this time: which makes sense.
Friar
Elias, on the other hand says Our Lady directs us to 'stand around
together and pray' when this happens, (as if we are going to be able
to.)
“Our
Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “You will close the doors of your hoses,
close the windows of your homes, you will light a candle for My
Immaculate Heart, and
you will stand in a circle in front of my altar
to pray and plead for this world, in the face of everything that will
happen. And you will
go through the Three Days of Darkness in this way,
...)
Frankly,
Marie-Julie makes much more sense, we are going to be begging God for
protection and literally on our knees during this time of terror.
Yet, Friar Elias makes it sound like that it is not going to be so
bad we can all stand around? Who in their right mind would dare to
'stand' before God at the moment, and not be begging on our knees?
When
a visionary contradicts a true mystic, that's a sure sign of a fake.
Obviously,
Friar Elias and his associated mystics are fake. His prophecies are
not in the Timeline.
