!? Friar Elias del Sagrado Corazon de Jesus (2007- to Present Day)


STATUS: 'Friar Elias' and two other so-called seers 'Mother' Maria Shimani de Monserrat and 'Sister' Lucia de Jesus from Salta Uruguay, are part of an ecumenical community called the 'Grace Mercy Order' that bears no affiliation to any institutionalised religion, therefore, is not under obedience to the Church. They run a site called: 'Voice and Echo of the Divine Messengers'

One of Friar Elias' latest vision on the Three Days of Darkness also promotes practises contrary to the teachings of the Church, and, several of this videos feature New Age type cosmic 'mysto' babble that show these visions aren't Catholic.



Here are the red flags showing he and any mystic attached to him are a fake:



:::::::::::::::



'Rogue', 'Lone Wolf', or maverick visionaries and orders:



Friar Elias is part of a 'monastic' community that is ecumenical without formal ties to any institutionalised religion and is not under the authority of the Church. So, basically, they are fake religious.



A visionary that refuses to submit to the authority of the Catholic Church, attempts to set up an organisation, monastic or lay order or foundation that is ecumenical and / or 'open to all religions' so it is purposely not placed under the authority of the Church is a huge sign of a fake.



A true mystic always is submissive and obedient to the Church and submits their order or the charters of their order to be considered to the Church.



These disobedient organisations are usually set up independently from the Church so they can also rake in money and not have to submit to the Church regarding tithes, or, even start a cult following, etc. Moneymaking rackets are also a huge sign of a fake.





:::::::::::::::::



Encouraging the practise to seek out your Guardian angel's name and invoke it-this is CONTRARY TO the CHURCH'S INSTRUCTIONS





“Our Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “... and then you will call your guardian angels (i.e. During the 3 Days of Darkness), even if you do not know his name. If it were a necessary grace, you will know what your guardian angel is called and so you will invoke it so that it (your angel) may be close to you....





Red flag: To use angel names not revealed in Scripture, or, to make an attempt to seek out your guardian angel's name is completely discouraged by the Catholic Church. God reserves angel names to Himself, so to try and found out their names has been discouraged by the Church as you could actually be naming a demon. Click here to read more about that.



And, this vision is outright wrong - it is NOT a necessary grace to know our angel's name we can still call upon and invoke them for the same exact help not knowing their names.  An untruth is a sign of a fake.



When a vision attempts to say it is okay to seek out your guardian angel's name, or God will permit it sometimes, then they are fake as a true vision never promotes disobedience to the Church.



Also, bad grammar – can't seem to stay either in past tense or future tense – if it 'were a necessary grace' meaning it wasn't back then, but then switching to 'you will know'. Proper language should be 'it will be a necessary grace' – sounds like Heaven doesn't know what it is talking about. Sign of a faker making it up as they go.





:::::::::::::::::::::::::



No true ecstasy.  From videos showing his 'visions' you can tell he is not in ecstasy -- he is blinking, swallowing, etc. Looks like he is faking up a vision as he goes.



:::::::::::::::::::



Using Non-Catholic, Pagan or 'Pagan approving', 'New Age', 'Mother Earth' spiritism type language



“Our Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “That is why I come here to Ecuador ... Today I come here to give you this special blessing for all your people, for all your culture, for your original principles that were so positive and good, for your origins and for your roots that must continue to penetrate into the depths of the human consciousness ....”



This harping back to 'all your culture' sounds like she's also saying their indigenous pagan past was also equally good, as if a demon were preparing the way for the Pachamama ritual that occurred at the Vatican.



And, Friar Elias' 'visions' constantly have the recurring term 'human consciousness' or 'consciousness' when referring to the spirit, which sounds so New Age. Also, 'essence' constantly pops up, as the guardian angels protect “our essences” (Feb. 25, 2018) Again, more New Age babble.





This is a sign of a fake.





::::::::::::::::::::



Bad grammar or nonsensical language in his vision:



Heaven may use 'simple language', but Our Lord and the Mother of God know how to speak properly and are coherent in their messages. They are direct and to the point.



There is a difference between Heaven wanting to repeat a message so we don't forget, and when a visionary goes off rambling as if they haven't a clue what they're talking about and makes contradictory or repetitive statements that over qualify to the point the sentence is nonsense. The latter is a sign something is being made up on the spot, or, the mystic is making something up and hasn't a clue what they're talking about.



Here's an example:



“Our Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “With the sweetness of your hearts today I can be here and bring more graces to the world, not only for your lives, but also for the planet which suffers in various parts of the world without anyone knowing.”



The section “which suffers in various parts of the world” is an unnecessary and ridiculous restatement. We know she's talking about the planet when she refers to it suffering, so why restate it again with such nonsense grammar? Sounds like Friar Elias is making things up off the cuff.



Another example of nonsense and illogical statements:



“Our Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “To be able today to say all these simple but true things, I must remove evil from the surface of the planet with the compelling and loving help of the Angels of God, under the Celestial Command of the Archangel St. Michael.”





So, Our Lady could not come and give her message that day unless St. Michel removed all evil from the planet? I doubt Heaven stopped the world from sinning right at that particular moment – sin was going on for sure. And, why use the future tense 'I must'? Is she in the present or the future? Again, sounds like she doesn't know what she's talking about, a vision being manufactured off the cuff so to speak.





:::::::::::::::::::



Strange non-Catholic or unofficial titles for the Mother of God, especially when they contradict Catholic teaching / theology



In one part of the message of Feb. 25, 2018, Our Lady supposedly says: “I am the Mother of the Sovereign Sceptre of God and with It cause the Will of the Most High to descend to earth.”





A theologian might have to check up on my assessment of this to see if I'm on the right path, but I can see this is wrong.



The 'sceptre of God' mentioned in the Bible is symbolic of God's almighty authority – Mary is Mother of the Son, but NOT of the Father. Since authority comes from the Father too, she cannot be the 'mother' of the Father's authority. She would have to be Mother of the Father to be mother of His authority as well, and that would mean she was higher than the Father.



Then, if she is supposed to be referring to Christ as the 'Sceptre' as the Father did hand all authority of Heaven and Earth to Him after all, she is saying she has power over 'It' to bring the Will of the Most High to Earth – here she is saying she has power over her Divine Son, and will 'use' Him to bring His own Will to earth? Sounds like a nonsense riddle here.



Also, seems to be giving herself considerable powers over God Himself and His Will when she of herself does not have divine power and is herself a handmaid to God's Will as she said herself in the Bible



Another example of “Our Lady” giving herself powers like God's is that she says she 'redeems' souls, when it is Christ who redeems souls – Mary at best "could" one day be called a co-redeemer, (but this is still a big question in the Church if she may be given this title), and even if she does receive this title one day,  she cannot completely redeem a soul as she claims to Friar Elias - that is something only Christ can do: (Feb, 25, 2018) “I draw lost spirits to my heart, I redeem fallen consciences that they reach redemption and peace'.  So, this is sentence marks a major theological error.



Also, a conscience cannot 'fall'. The conscience is the 'inner voice of God within us' and is the knowledge of God's law and our duties that we have attained through our human understanding and is a practical act of the intellect that informs our actions. It is a sinner who falls, the conscience is what informs their actions and warns if they are good or bad and is an act of the intellect. Very strange Our Lady says she “redeems fallen consciences”, giving herself divine powers and talking as if she doesn't know what a conscience is.



So there are several contradictions here showing signs of a fake.



::::::::::::::::::



Requesting impossibilities that may hamper daily duties / mix-up of priorities



The Church teaches daily duties come first, and both Heaven and the Church does not demand impossibilities. A fake vision sometimes makes impossible demands for graces of protection or similar graces that goes beyond what can be accomplished according to daily duties in order to discourage people and make them give up, or, fail in their daily duties.



In one message, the demand is for DAILY confession.



“Our Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “Do not look for Jesus in the Eucharist, but also in daily confession, in fasting, in prayer and above all, in the service of the poorest of the poor.”



Very few people have the luxury to be able to go daily to confession. Not only do some parishes not have the resources to be that available to their congregations, but how many living in the world can go daily to confession due to necessary demands on their time?   This is an impossible request to make for the laity.



Also, Satan is very good at getting us snow blinded with the wrong perception or a mix up of priorities regarding the importance of good deeds. Notice that serving the poor is put 'above all' in this message, even before seeking Jesus in the Eucharist, when the Church teaches the greatest good act one can do is to attend Mass, which outweighs all fasting, alms giving, and mortifications, etc. Beware of anything lessening devotion to the Blessed Sacrament or contradicting Church teachings.



::::::::::::::::::::



Contradicts the vision of Marie-Julie Jahenny



I've noticed this seem to have become the 'litmus test' of an authentic mystic – if they contradict Marie-Julie Jahenny, there seems to be a red flag.



Our Lady tells Friar Elias that with prayer and living a good life as requested that 'you' (meaning us) can make “this land a Promised Land” (Feb. 25, 2018), when we know from Marie-Julie Jahenny that only Christ will bring about this renewal and the Age of Peace: we cannot expect it from any plans or actions of man, nor will we be able to bring this about as the true faithful are going to become very small. Yes, all we will have is prayer, but Christ Himself is going to have to step in, send the chastisements and renew the earth before every soul is lost Marie-Julie was told, the earth will have become that corrupt.







:::::::::::::::::::



His visions also contradicts Marie-Julie Jahenny's directions regarding the Three Days of Darkness:



Marie-Julie claims we are to kneel and pray during these three days of terror, and, even pray prostrate on the ground to implore God's mercy during this time: which makes sense.



Friar Elias, on the other hand says Our Lady directs us to 'stand around together and pray' when this happens, (as if we are going to be able to.)



“Our Lady” (Feb. 25, 2018) “You will close the doors of your hoses, close the windows of your homes, you will light a candle for My Immaculate Heart, and you will stand in a circle in front of my altar to pray and plead for this world, in the face of everything that will happen. And you will go through the Three Days of Darkness in this way, ...)



Frankly, Marie-Julie makes much more sense, we are going to be begging God for protection and literally on our knees during this time of terror. Yet, Friar Elias makes it sound like that it is not going to be so bad we can all stand around? Who in their right mind would dare to 'stand' before God at the moment, and not be begging on our knees?



When a visionary contradicts a true mystic, that's a sure sign of a fake.





Obviously, Friar Elias and his associated mystics are fake. His prophecies are not in the Timeline.