St. Thomas Becket (c.1118 -1170)




ST. THOMAS BECKET (c. 1118- 1170)

Also known as St. Thomas of Canterbury, he was appointed Archbishop of Canterbury in 1162. Once a great friend of Henry II of England, the friendship was forever ruptured when St. Thomas adamantly defended the rights and privileges of the Church and refused to allow the king extend royal authority over the courts of the Church. The King then accused St. Thomas and trumped up charges, and, the conflict grew to such an extent at one point St. Thomas was forced to flee the country. Eventually he was allowed to return, but the tension remained as St. Thomas did not relent when it came to defending the Church's rights and authority.

It is said Henry II, who had a notoriously short temper, eventually burst out in frustration: “Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?”

This sentence sealed St. Thomas' fate as four knights who believed they were doing the wishes of the king took it upon themselves to do just that – rid him of this priest. When they couldn't drag him outside, they brutally murdered him in his own cathedral, which occurred in 1170.

His gruesome death and his cult as a martyr grew rapidly in the public imagination. Soon after, he was canonised by Pope Alexander III, his tomb becoming one of the most popular pilgrimage sites during the medieval period until it was desecrated during the reign of Henry VIII, the votive gifts disappearing into the royal coffers. It is said the tomb was opened and the bones and ashes of St. Thomas were scattered by the iconoclasts.

Of interest, there have been several prophecies attributed to St. Thomas, and, there is a Great Monarch prophecy among them.


::::::::::::::::::

About the prophecy: the prophecy attributed to St. Thomas Beckett is very short. The one detail I personally find 'odd' is that the foretold leader to come is simply described as a 'knight', when creditable prophecies already foretell he is a prince / king of a royal house, not just a simple knight, and therefore one wonders if the text is real or has been manipulated.


Was it a made up prophecy to spur a knight into action to free the Holy Land, or was it a real prophecy of the Great Monarch to come made by St. Thomas?

Medieval writers could be notoriously unscrupulous and cavalier with their texts. Often they manipulated Great Monarch prophecies in order to either flatter their royal patrons or spur them into action if they idea was put forward that perhaps 'they' might be the chosen king of God. Sometimes they also made up a prophecy and attributed it to a saint!

Of interest is the emphasis given to Famagusta and Jaffa, and also the phrase 'Christ's grave' – Famagusta was the gateway to the Holy Land (the Levant) during the Medieval period, and Jaffa was a city in the Crusader State / Kingdom of Israel. The fact it concentrates on the Holy Sepulchre and not just mention 'Jerusalem' also points to the Crusader period, particularly the Knights Templar whose order was founded in 1119, around the time of the birth of St. Thomas, so this could be evidence someone wrote this prophecy to encourage knights to liberate the Holy Land, or this prophecy was indeed written around the time of St. Thomas, perhaps a short time after his death.

Strange this prophecy might point to the Templars, as they were loyal to Henry II who was at loggerheads with St. Thomas. There is documentary evidence of people warning St. Thomas not to trust the Templars because of their loyalty to Henry II although Sir Hastings, the Master of the Templar order in England, acted as mediator in an attempt to bring reconciliation between the two, (source, click here). Still, as I cannot find any proof St. Thomas didn't write the prophecy either, it has been included in the Timeline.

The list of events in the short prophecy show the three crowns in the region of Milan, Lombardy and elsewhere in Italy is what this great hero-knight will capture. Considering knights were the warrior class in the Crusader times, this is in keeping with the Great Catholic Monarch prophecies that say he will be a warrior king who will join his soldiers in battle like the kings of old did, and, as this is a Crusader-themed prophecy, this is also in keeping with the prophecies that state he will be like another St. Louis IX. St. Louis went to the Holy Land on a crusade, and, it is said in other prophecies the Great Monarch will capture the Holy Land.

However, this prophecy concentrates on the crowns of Italy. The famous Iron Crown of Lombardy is obviously one of them, the crown that the Holy Roman Emperors are crowned with when they are made Kings of Italy, which therefore implies that he will be Holy Roman Emperor. While attempting to guess what could be the next major crowns of Italy he will capture, it must be those of Naples and the Two Sicilies.

Of interest is that this knight will 'come from the west'. As the major Great Monarch prophecies say he will liberate France first, then Italy, this is correct. So, according to this prophecy attributed to St. Thomas, the Great Monarch will next concentrate on the Holy Land after he has reclaimed Europe for his kingdom. The prophecy is also correct in that this will take place near the end of the world as saints, and the fathers and doctors of the Church agree that these events and the Great Peace established by the Monarch comes just before the arrival of the Antichrist.

:::::::::::::::::::

Prophecy attributed to St. Thomas Becket:

“A knight shall come from the west. He shall capture Milan, Lombardy, and the three crowns. He shall then sail to Cyprus and Famagoste and land at Joffa, and reach Christ's grave where he will fight. Wars and wonders shall befall till the people believe Christ toward the end of the world.”


:::::::::::::


:::::::::::::

(May 23,  2020)