!? John of Jerusalem / Jehan de Vézelay (1042 -1119)
STATUS: HOAX / FORGERY
There is a new plethora of prophecies foretelling the evil times after the year 2000 AD attributed to a John of Jerusalem, also called 'Jehan de Vézelay', who is declared to have taken part in the liberation of Jerusalem in 1099 AD during the Crusades and was one of the nine founding knights of the Templars along with Hugues de Payens. It then said when John with the knights took up his station at the Temple mount in Jerusalem, he discovered a hidden secret, and this gave him the gift of prophecy. The prophecies make reference to immigration, drugs, pollution, technology and modern media technology. There is a claim John made seven copies of his book, that St. Bernard of Clairvaux had three of them, Rome has a copy, and that even one of them 'could' have been discovered by Nostradamus, and, that the KGB got their hands on one, etc. etc. ---
There are many red flags here.
There is no such person in history named 'John of Jerusalem' or 'Jehan de Vézelay' who was a founder of the Templars, and, his biography doesn't match that of any other historical person at the time. His name didn't appear until 1994 when his prophecies were first published in France by an individual named Galvieski (1917-1995) who is described as a 'professor' and who claimed the texts date from the 14th century, plus, that he found his copy in the KBG archives. This in itself is strange as John of Jerusalem, if he existed and made the copies as claimed, would have made his copies in the 13th century, not the 14th.
The author Galvieski doesn't seem to have existed either, for someone who is described as a 'professor' and could get in to KGB archives, nobody knows anything about him other than he must be a Russian,which is also strange. (But then, the whole KGB thing sounds fabricated as an element of purposely devised mystique.)
It has been observed we see a convenient use of dates: strange to have “John” set off to found a new order and also head off to fight when he was 77 in 1119. It has been suggested with the mention of the year 1099 and the liberation of Jerusalem, the author got the idea to name his knight John after another order, the 'Knights Hospitalers of St. John', which were founded in 1099 after the liberation.
Also, one of the big red flags: no original copy of this prophecy has been photographed or exhibited to date, neither has an early second-hand copy. Also, it is very strange to have important prophecies, especially as St. Bernard is said to have three copies, not to have surfaced until now centuries later, and then, only in a book whose author is as shadowy and unknown as John of Jerusalem himself, unless they were indeed a 20th-century hoax and never existed in the first place.
Other odd things showing this to be fake—what 'secret thing' at the Temple mount made 'John' a prophet? No vision is described, only some 'secret discovery' made him a prophet. This doesn't sound like an authentic Catholic mystic who would tell what had happened to them, or how God had given them the gift of prophecy, if indeed it was God-given, but rather, this sounds like something based on the old Freemason legends that declare the Knights Templar discovered something in the Temple and kept it hidden, either the Ark or the 'Philosopher's Stone' of Alchemy, thereby becoming the first Freemasons hiding a great secret of wisdom according to some of their gobbledygook legends.
Also, the prophecies are not like any other Catholic prophecies regarding the end times, especially those dating from the Medieval period. It is noted there is no mention of the Second Coming of Christ, no struggle against Antichrist, no reference to victory over original sin. Regarding the promised Age of Peace, there is no mention of the Great Monarch or an Angelic Pontiff, but instead, various promises on a psychic and physical development of Man giving him divine and supernatural powers as well as access to wisdom and peace. Sounds more like an age of 'brotherly fraternity' of a Masonic nature again.
Furthermore, we see in the prophecies a promised domination of 'Enlightened Feminism' in which it will be women that will rule over men in this golden age and Woman will impose on Man whatever she thinks. The prophecies in the last two stanzas declares, Man discovers that "all living things are bearers of light" and learns that the latter will not be extinguished. The prophecy has the particularity of claiming the Masonic motto order through chaos (ordo ab chao) as well as the reference to the bearer of light commonly designating the title, the name of Lucifer.
Therefore, this is no credible Catholic prophecy, it is a hoax attempting to put forward a Masonic, New Age way of thinking, which didn't even begin forming as we know it until the early 18th century, which is another anachronism if the prophecies were supposed to have been written circa the 13th century. Obvious hoax.
::::::::::::::::
Return to the Great Catholic Monarch and Angelic Pontiff prophecies, click here.
::::::::::::::::::
Please help support this site, click here to find out how.
