Have a Question? Ask here.

Have a question about the prophecies?  Leave it in the Comment Box.


*  Rules for questions: before asking, make sure your question hasn't already been answered below: also please check the Timeline on the Main Page, and  this list of clickable questions here:

  ~ Church Approval of Apparitions: How Does That Work?

 ~ Does a Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur of an Alleged Mystic's book Equal Church Approval of that Mystic and their Visions?  (Short answer - no.  See the full explanation by clicking here.)

~ Do the (Credible) Prophecies Posted Here Support Sedevacantism? 

~ How Do I Prepare for the Chastisement Plagues?

~ Is the Three Days of Darkness in the Bible?

~ How do I Recognize and Prepare for the Three Days of Darkness?

:::::::::::::

Note: I'm not a theologian, only a lay person doing their best to find answers, however, my answers will follow the Traditional teachings of the Church, the Douay Rheims Bible, the pre Vatican II Traditional explanation of the Catechism by Spirago and Clarke, and also from apparitions / mystics approved by the Church.  (If you want to know why I started this site in the first place, click here.)


Take note this blog is a work in progress, so not every apparition or prophecy is up yet.

The purpose of this blog is to build a Timeline of prophetic events primarily around the Great Monarch and the Angelic Pontiff, which includes the chastisements,  Three Days of Darkness, the Age of Peace, and how to prepare for it all, etc.   

Researching all of this, finding trustworthy sources, translating original texts, and separating the real apparitions and prophecies from the fake ones takes time, and I only have so much time!  Please, DO NOT demand I cover an apparition that is not up yet, please be patient. 

Also, please take into account if an apparition or a mystic doesn't give prophetic details of what we can expect or they do not give a prophecy or a further clarification on the Great Catholic Monarch or Pontiff, or the events leading up to their arrival and afterwards, they probably WILL NOT be put up on this site.


****  Questions once answered may eventually be removed to declutter this page make space for new questions, so if you have left a question, please check in to this page from time to time to ensure you get the answer when I put it up before I delete it.  The last time the page was decluttered is posted below.


Also, no spam, nasty comments or troll posts please, these will be removed.

Thank you.


Last date page was decluttered to make room for new questions: March 16, 2021.

 

 


196 comments:

  1. What will go on in The United States during this time period? I know about Russia and the conversion, but what else?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to Theresa Neumann, the stigmatist in Germany, America will not know a foreign invasion on its soil, but will suffer for its sins through natural disasters, (which will weaken it econmically). Bl Elena Aiello says America and Russia will battle each other with their secrets armies. (Cold War tactics...meaning always in a state of suspicion and unrest). So America will suffer too. It won't escape chastiement. It will probably suffer food shortages of the natural disaster affect food supply, especially as diasters will hit all aroud the world.

      Delete
    2. But in one of the prophesies it says that Russia will attack the US(?) with secret weapons:
      “Apparently, it will be the Russians who are called in to shore up the Red Revolution in France- they will fight America as well with their secret weapons and overthrow Europe”

      Could this be nuclear bombs dropped in several cities in the country?

      Delete
    3. Possibly it's not easy to see how things will play out in the States as most of the prophecies focus on Europe regarding the coming chastisements, so Europe is the 'canary in the coalmine' so to speak.

      Delete
  2. What will go on in The United States during this time period? I know about Russia and the conversion, but what else?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suggest that Desmond A Birch has the answer to that question. He wrote the epic book Trial, Tribulation and Triumph - Before during and after Antichrist. The book contains a Timeline setting out in detail what will occur during the Minor Chastisement (so-called to distinguish it from the Major Chastisement at the time of Antichrist). If you send me an email at lauriemyers86@gmail.com I can send you a copy of the Minor Chastisement...my understanding is that God will be sending this Chastisement to all people in the world except for Souls consecrated to Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Blessed Mother Mary. It is also prophesied that an area in France will be protected.

      Delete
  3. Why would anyone want to avoid the Great Chastisement? The purification of the world? Before more souls are corrupted? The coming tribulations are a symbol not only of God's pure justice but his love as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi. Well, as much as we wish to see evil punished and stripped away, Our Lord said to Marie-Julie He created us in Love, and it is because of His love He does not want to strike in His anger. He would hold off the time of the chastisements because when He strikes this time, so many will be sent to Hell en masse, and He is giving the extra time to allow as many souls to convert as possible. Much of the extra time has been granted by Our Lady's intercessions as well, even Heaven keeps telling us to pray to hold it off! We might have even had the Age of Peace come sooner without the huge chastisements if Russia had been consecrated to the Immaculate Heart in a timely fashion when requested. Much of the evil now in the world which has brought it to this state was spread through Communistic / Socialistic ideals, etc. For instance, not only was Soviet Russia anti-God and religion, but it was the first country to legalise abortion, etc.


      God does not want to show His anger, because it is indeed terrible when let loose, even when just. He said when He strikes this time, the time of Mercy will be temporarily at and end and His Justice will take over - He will not allow His Mercy to be touched or implored for the earth until the cleansing is past, and it is going to be mighty. First, the bloody wars are going to be worse than the other two world wars put together. It will be short, but the blood flowing will be intense it will be horrific. Then we will also have the 3 Days of Darkness, thereabouts. The Three Days of Darkness are going to be horrific. Hell is literally go to be let loose and demons will roam the earth causing havoc, and the fire of Heaven will fall from the sky. Several mystics have dreaded that they might live to see His wrath. As much as His mercy is infinite and incalcuable, the sight of God's just anger is beyond our imagination as well. It is because of God's wrath we are to black out out windows and not to look out when the 3 Days happens, because it will kill us. It is probably the reason why Lot and his family were instructed to not to look back when the fire fell from Heaven. God does not want His loyal children to see that. So yes, God is going to cleanse the earth to prevent what is left of the good people from being corrupted, but He Himself sincerely wished it did not need to come to that point. Basically, it is good to yearn for the Age of Peace, but at the same time pray we need not have the chastisements for it to come, or at least pray to have them mitigated.

      Delete
  4. who are these "Several mystics" namely?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Off the top of my head, Alois Irlmaier is one. He said he ws glad he was dying before the time came for what he saw. If I remember rightly, I think Mother Marianna of Quito Ecuador was also struck dead when she saw the horrors of our future century she foretold, Christ had to raise her up from the dead to continue her mission of expiation on earth! As, the evils on earth will be horrible, so will the chastisements be that are coming to clease the earth.

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I've heard of that miracle, but the sword was left as a sign God gives graces to help overcome sin no matter how impossible it seems, for nothing is impossible for God. As Arthurian as it sounds, I personally cannot see the Great Monarch pulling that sword out – why undo one miracle to prove his identity when he will have so many miracles of his own?

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. The Antichrist comes after the Great Monarch and will destroy the Age of Peace before the Second Coming, the Antichrist will attack the Church and the remnant of the Jews will follow him for a time, he will set up his seat in the rebuilt temple in Jerusalem, or close to it somewhere in the Middle east. For people of faith, the Antichrist will not be that hard to identify, he will also promote the Arian heresy again as St. John and St.Polycarp predicted. Should be easy to identify when he comes as he will manifest himself in public and persecute Christians. No-brainer there.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. "Extinguish not the spirit. Despise not prophecies.” (1 Thess. 5:19-20)

      The majority of the need-to know warnings about the Antichrist are in the Book of the Apocalypse and are prophecies.

      “Blessed is he that keepeth the words of the prophecy of this book." [Apocalypse (Revelation) 22:7]

      “... prophecies (are signs) not to unbelievers, but to believers." [1 Corinthians 14:22]

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  6. England appears (reconverted to the True Faith) in some prophecies -- Don Bosco is one; what others?
    The Late Fr Malachi Martin (died 1999) in an interview with Canadian Catholic Bernard Janzen predicted in passing that the people of the UK would make an intense effort to leave the EU, but that he did not know if they would succeed. . . indeed, this first day of independence from the EU, (1 Jan 2021) it is not clear how good the rushed, last-minutes "trade agreement" between UK & EU really is. What are the approved prophecies concerning "England (UK) ?"
    I am wondering if the new Ordinariate instituted by Pope Benedict XVI is the means by which the country is brought back to the true faith.
    I am also aware of some prophecy (?) indicating that after HM Queen Elizabeth, the British Monarchy will "totter" because of the corruption of the sinfulness of the Royal family.
    Comment?
    Thank you for you excellently researched and organised site.
    --Adrian Johnson, UK

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RE: England –there are a few prophecies, not many, (perhaps I might find some more later), but to find what is there already, go back the the Timeline and hit CTRL + F

      A small searchbar should pop up on the bottom of your browser. Type in the keyword 'England' and it will search out all text on the page with 'England' in it. Probably the fastest way to find what prophecies I have up at the moment.

      Delete
  7. Do you recommend any commentary books on the Bible for someone who wants to study theology? Besides Thomas Aquinas’ commentary. I can’t afford his books.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also, you mentioned we need ‘black paper’ to cover our windows and vents during the 3 days. But what is black paper and where can we find it? Thank you.

      Delete
    2. Yes, the Haydock commentary is an excellent text on the Douay-Rheims Bible. You can find an online chapter by chapter version here:

      https://web.archive.org/web/20160422023253/http://haydock1859.tripod.com/

      About black 'paper' – that detail is by Alois Irlmaier. I don't think he lived long enough to see the 'plastic age' we are living in now, and so we can guess he meant anything that would seal off the windows to keep the poison dust from getting in, and, to also block out the light, including the color of the sky. Marie-Julie Jahenny said even the color of the sky would be terrifying and strike us dead during the Three Days of Darkness. So basically, get black plastic garbage bags, or a similar material dark enough to block out the light and air, and seal the windows and doors properly. Also, don't forget to seal any air vents and fireplaces, (when the time comes of course).

      Delete
    3. Thank you so much! God bless!

      Delete
  8. Your research and your comments are excellent. I recommend to those person who are interested in this subject to consult my e-book on this subject which is available on Amazon-Kindle at https://www.amazon.com/Catholic-Prophecy-Consecration-Russia-Church-ebook/dp/B01M73ZJCR/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Lawrence+J+Myers&qid=1616016067&sr=8-1

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here is a better and shorter link - https://www.amazon.com/Catholic-Prophecy-Consecration-Russia-Church-ebook/dp/B01M73ZJCR

    ReplyDelete
  10. As a native Hungarian speaker I have to say that your comment on the former french president Sarkozy's name is not correct. The name Sárközy may not be translated as "pillar of mud".

    The name comes from the geographical name of Sárköz

    Sárköz + y = a man from Sárköz. The y at the end means "from"

    Sár in hungarian means "mud". Used in a geographical area's name "sár" could refer to marsh or mire

    The word köz means between / among / amidst.

    So Sárköz means: a territory , an area, an alley, a passage, a village situated between mud or marshes

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, thanks for the explanation – this confirms the 'mud' reference. From what you have said then, 'Sarkozy' still comes from or refers to a 'marsh', 'mire' or the 'mud'. A 'mire' is a slush mud from a bog, and also means something undiserable as we have an expression in English, 'in the mire' when you're at the low end of things. The literal French words used is 'post in the mud' as in a 'pole in the mud', or 'stick in the mud'. We also have to keep in mind there are cryptic word plays in Marie-Julie's prophecies as well since God hides information from those who do not wish to see, yet reveals just enough for those who do have eyes to see. There is an expression referring to leaders or people of great influence or power – the expression a 'pillar' of society is sometimes used for people you can look up to as a role model, but the prophecy warns he will not be a good leader, not someone to place our confidence in as he will not be the one destined to restore France to her Catholic roots. Sarkozy would truly be a 'pillar' or 'post of mud'. ('Post' can also mean 'position' – he is from a 'position of mud'.) Also, it was the French (not me) who noticed if you take the 'sar' and the 'k' from 'koz', it makes up the word 'pole' (sark), if Google Translate is translating properly. They are probably not far wrong. 'Pole' could be a word game for 'pole' as in 'post' or 'pillar', but also for a 'pole point' as in the North and South pole that runs on a axis, which is apoint on a major 'column' on which the whole world pivots, again, like with a world leader. So, it is still very apropos with regards to Sarkozy. How many Presidents or major leaders in France are literally going to have 'mud' 'mire' and 'pole' meanings attached to their name? It has to be him.

      Delete
  11. Is there anything here about Alois Irlmaier?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes -

      https://greatmonarch-angelicpontiffprophecies.blogspot.com/p/alois-irlmaier1894-1959-deciding.html

      Delete
  12. Greetings from Poland. What will go on in Poland during this period? Are there any prophesis from true mystics concerning precisely the time we have now, especially about the vaccines they want us to accept, are they in any way a threat to our salvation?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi. Well, apart from St. Faustina's visions of the Divine Mercy preparing the world during this current period as the time of Mercy before the chastisements really strike (also foretold to Marie-Julie Jahenny), I haven't found anything specific regarding the chastisements and Poland. However, my personal guess is judging from Our Lord's words to St. Faustina about His light shining from Poland is the Polish will have the grace to hang in there when the troubles hit and will help re-establish the Faith, it's one of the few countries in the EU fighting back and trying to hang on to its Catholic identity and culture.

      Re: the vaccines -- the approved and credible mystics from the past that I've read haven't literally mentioned them, and any new 'mystic' cropping up now warning against them are fake, or probably will prove to be fake mystics - it's easy to get 'popular' as a fake mystic when they can harp on people's fears, or make self fulfilling prophecies by making educated guesses by watching current events unfold.

      However, I personally do not like the COVID vaccines let loose on us right now, rushed research yet flung out into the market, etc. and, as for matters of the conscience I cannot see how the ones tested on aborted fetal tissue could be ethical for a Catholic to use. If the test cells used had come from a live donor who gave consent to have their cells constantly cloned for the vaccine research and testing, fine, but this is obviously different. For me, consent to aborted fetal tissue being used is like saying it's okay to experiment with aborted babies, which it isn't. It will allow the scientists take more grotesque liberties with their experiments. Also, ligtimise the grotestque market of selling baby body parts for research, which is happening already for quite some time now.

      Delete
  13. Hi, E.A.. I’ve been wondering, have you seen the new TV series, The Chosen? If so, what do you think of it? I honestly really like it but the new season is getting to be more and more Protestant and I am starting to get uneasy about it. I know it was created by a Protestant. Does watching and supporting this show go against the 5 blasphemies against the Immaculate Heart? The show conveys Our Lady as just a regular person and who had a regular birth and may even suggest that she was not a perpetual virgin. It kind of sucks cause the actor who plays Jesus is a devout Catholic and that is what I’ve justified in continuing to watch the show. I just wanted to hear your thoughts on it. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  14. P.S. sorry for the totally random question! I value your opinion and trust you and your blog even tho we have never met lol, thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi. About the 'Chosen' – no I haven't seen it. From what I've read about it the producers / writers, etc. wanted to portray the life of Christ through the eyes of those who met Him, and if they intended to fill several TV seasons, you can expect 'Hollyweird' to add in a lot of weird fillers, especially if one of the main producers is Protestant, you are not going to get a 100% accurate theological work.

      RE: about Our Lady having Our Lord through a natural birth. I don't think blasphemy was blatantly intended – a lot of times, these types of portrayals are due to major human ignorance of the theological situation. Even Zeffirelli, who was Catholic, portrayed Our Lady going through a painful natural birth in 'Jesus of Nazareth', and you would think he would have known better. There are other inaccuracies too, like St. Joseph about to put away Our Lady because he first thought she had conceived an illegitimate child, but the saints, Doctors and Fathers of the Church have shown that is not true, St. Joseph knew she was innocent, believed she had indeed conceived by the power of God, but was afraid and felt unworthy to be near the Mother of God or have her and the Holy Child under his roof, which is why the angel had to come and reassure him to take her as his spouse. Yet, despite the errors, I don't think it is purposely indulging in a blasphemy by watching the show. 'Jesus of Nazareth' still is very beautiful in a lot of places.

      A lot of people simply don't understand that having the flesh opened painfully in childbirth is also the mark of loss of virginity of a woman. They don't know that virginity doesn't just mean 'not knowing man', it means the flesh must also be left intact not 'opened' in childbirth. Our Lady's virginity was left intact, Our Lord's birth was completely miraculous and Our Lady did not suffer any pain, or have her flesh opened. Saints have seen how He miraculously passed through her flesh without opening it. The thing is, this is not made plainly 'obvious' in the Gospels but through solid theological deduction, and, producers don't refer to the teachings or the Fathers and Doctors of the Church to see how they explain that God would never take away one of the greatest gifts He gave His mother, which was a complete unblemished virginity without any stain of original sin. She cannot have 'stained' flesh which is the result of original sin, especially after the most Pure Being was born from her. Producers only stick with what their own faulty human reasoning sees in the Gospels and film a regular human birth, so we can certainly expect such faulty reasoning from non-Catholics who don't know any better.

      If we happen to watch things like this in films, we just have to keep in mind what is true, and if someone asks us, remind them that what is real teachings of the Church and that not everything was portrayed correctly. If it turns out a show is really really bad, just don't recommend it, let it die a quiet death. Say a prayer of reparation instead that such a bad show was made. Speaking out against a production sometimes makes people want to watch it all the more.

      Delete
  15. Hi, I'm from Spain and I am really interested in the part my country will play in this. Before seeing this page I only knew the prophecies from Bug de Milhas and Ezquioga, which look like a real possibility because of our current political situation in Spain, so I assumed the great monarch would be from Spain not France, but you say those prophecies are probably fake. Having this said, there are way more prophecies of the king being from france than from spain, so I guess he'll be in france. I also see in your page different prophecies of Spain, saying that the king of france and spain will be the same or that the king of spain will be allied to the french one. So, what do you think the role of spain will be?
    Also, do you think we are getting closer to see this all happening? Personally I do and I don't think it's going to take much longer. Thanks in advance

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hola! From what I can tell, the Spanish king will be a Catholic ally of the Great Monarch of France, they will be two different kings, not the same. According to the prophecies, I think it is the prophecy of St. Francis of Paola, the Great Monarch will not allow the kings of Europe to hold their thrones unless the are Catholic, or convert to Catholicism and swear allegiance to him as the Holy Roman Emperor. The holy kings will join his army of the 'Cruciferi' to help cast out the invaders, and, then the kings will help restore Catholicism in their own countries following the holy example of the Great Monarch of France. Spain will be one of the countries. At least, that's what it seems like. It certainly seem like it will be coming 'sooner' than later, when though is another matter. What seems like a very very short time for Heaven seems a bit long for us - like when Our Lady of Fatima told Sr. Lucia she would be taken to Heaven 'soon', but she lived into her 80s. So, we have to wait and see.

      Delete
    2. It's the same. The prophecies are the same since the monarchy of Spain is originated in France. Isaiah 23:10 mentioned even Latin America as the daughter of Tarsis. Remember that Marie Julie Jahenny talked about the new France. Well, the new France in Latin America is for sure Costa Rica.

      Delete
    3. The qustion was if the king of France and Spain will be the same person, the credible prophecies show the Kings are different, the King of France brings in the renewal and will become Holy Roman Empereor, the Spanish king will be his ally.

      Delete
  16. From what I can gather, the Allied victory in WWII seems to serve as the catalyst for the start of the Satanic century. What's the significance of this? WWI was the triumph of Anglo-American liberalism over the old monarchic world order of Germany and Austria-Hungary (a war with less objective "good/bad" sides of which a compelling argument could be made in favour of a Central Powers victory), but many would argue that the outcome of WWII (the triumph of liberalism over what's generally considered to be the far worse fate of fascism) was the objectively correct one. What are we supposed to infer from this (if anything)? That the Allies were the greater evil?

    Also, many prophecies reference Russia. Assuming the prophesied times are near (next few decades), it seems unlikely Russia would develop the capabilities or motive to inflict the sheer destruction described. Is it possible they were presuming the continued existence of the Soviet Union and things didn't pan out as expected? Prophecies aren't necessarily set in stone and might only offer a disjointed/vague picture. Perhaps they're referring to the forces of leftism more generally as opposed to Russia itself?

    Look forward to your response.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, I'll try and answer this if I can. WWII as far as I can tell was the beginning of the chastisements: Our Lord told Marie-Julie Jahenny she would live to see the spark that would ignite the chastisements, and she lived to see WWI, and also WWII begin and died before it ended. Basically, WWII may have been the announcement of the 'Satanic Century' - Bl Catherine Emmerick announced Satan would be loosed 50 or 60 years before the year 2,000, but he would prepare well in advance for his era 'a time and a time' - we could really say this diabolical preparation began with the French Revolution, which ignited an unstable Europe turning -antia-Catholic little by little and yearning to get rid of its Catholic monarchies and heritage, hence the rise of socialist anarchists, and the eventually assassination of the the Austro-Hungarian heir Archduke Franz Ferdinand that started WWI, which never really ended but was reignited with WWII, etc. The threads keep going. The thing is, we see the outcome of these wars that are promoted as good, aka the Allies winning over fascism, etc, but it's the Masonic hidden agendas that are continually spread underneath them that are diabolical: these wars are only a means to an end with the evil ones in power...aka the One World anti-Catholic government, etc.

      About Russia: yes, certain prophecies refer to it, and, a few of this prophecies are conditional, depending mankind does penance and converts, etc. There was indeed a problem during the Cold War era, which appears to have simmered down, but, don't rule Russia out yet ... God can raise up a punishing nation very fast when needed. He revealed to Bl Anna Maria Taigi He raises up leaders when He needs them to either punish or reward a nations ... He said He rose up Napoleon to punish Europe, and them lowered him just as quickly when finished with him. (Although his soul was saved in the end Bl Taigi was also told as Napoleon allowed Catholicism to be practiced in France again, this earned him the grace of conversion and final repentance.) Look how fast his rise and fall was. The same can happen to Russia.

      Delete
  17. What is your opinion of the South African "prophet" Siener Van Rensburg?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A non-Catholic "prophet" from the Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa. If so-called prophets aren't Catholic, it's not wise to delve into such 'prophecies' or waste time on them, you don't know by who or what they were truly influenced. Satan said to Marie-Julie Jahenny he wanted to get people lost in a mess of fake prophets that sound like real ones during his century, even wasting time on them so they don't pay attention to the real mystics, so we can be sure it's not a great idea to read anything claiming to be 'prophetic' that we know for certain is from a non-Catholic. One example I see of a 'prophecy' of his seems staged, or a 'non-prophecy', as he "saw" a vision of something when it had already happened but tried to sound important with his 'announcement'. Even a witness said the announcement of the prophecy felt 'staged'.

      Delete
  18. Would anyone be willing to work together to do some practical things, in addition to prayer and fasting of course, to wake up the people of the world and reduce the severity of the Chastisement? Perhaps we could start by asking some French Carmelites to look for the writings of Sr. Mary of St. Peter. I wonder whether this is why Heaven gave us so much detail about the events that are about to happen: so that at least some of these conditional prophecies could be prevented if enough of us put in sufficient effort, in deed, word, and prayer, to thwart the plans of the adversary. Otherwise, it would be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon than for us, to whom much is given.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Greetings. What do you think of Elizabeth Kindelmann’s diary and The Flame of Love Movement?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't looked into that yet. You might find your answer here, apparently, she has not received approval yet. (Copy and paste the link into your browser.)

      https://www.catholic.com/qa/elizabeth-kindelmann-and-her-reported-flame-of-love-private-revelations

      Delete
    2. Another incorrect statement by the webmaster - Cardinal Peter Erdo of Hungary gave Approval of the Flame of Love Messages some years ago.

      Delete
    3. Well, I just found the official statement from the Archbishop of Hungary- and I agree with the original site I found and stand with my statement she HERSELF is not approved yet, there is an imprimatur for the diary and the movement, but NOT for the mystic yet. The church often does this, a prayer revealed by a mystic can be given an imprimatur, etc, but it DOES NOT mean the mystic themself is approved yet. An imprimatur for the writings of a mystic or okaying a prayer movement they start is still not officially authenticating a mystic until their experiences are declared 'supernatural'. It appears he agrees the movement is okay, and the Diary itself is okay, and the diary may be read and the movement followed, and it's producing good spiritual fruit, etc., but I find it EXTREMELY odd he himself did not consider it important to discern the nature of the voices and her experiences,

      Quote "No one asks – since this is not
      important – what is the nature of the experiences that she
      describes in her Spiritual Diary. This is not the task which
      the Church has undertaken in these years of judgment"

      Wow. Not important? Discerning the types of experiences is exactly the job of the local Church authorities -- to discern if the messages are truly supernatural in origin or not, and if they are human inventions or imaginings or not. He literally said he did not do this, so she technically she is not yet an approved mystic, even if the Church declares we may read her writings and follow the resulting prayer movement at the moment.

      Delete
    4. The Question was:

      "What do you think of Elizabeth Kindelmann’s diary and The Flame of Love Movement?"

      I stand by my answer as well: Cardinal Erdo Approved the Diary and Movement.

      Delete
    5. I really wish people could read.

      I never said the prayer movement or the diary was not approved, only the mystic, so how could I be incorrect? There really is no argument there! I don't know why you're starting one. It is possible for the Church to temporarily approve a book or prayer movement but not a mystic that spreads them until further investigation is carried out.

      In my original answer, I was talking about the mystic herself: "she" as I said in the original answer, is not approved, and, I said the site I suggested would give the answer they were looking for as I hadn't looked into this particular mystic until now, (I can't give an opinion on a book I haven't read yet) and the site I found says the diary and the prayer movement IS currently approved. So, I was correct they would get the information they wanted from the site.

      Conclusion: I'm afraid you're incorrect here in saying I made a false statement when I was not - the mystic is not approved,and the site I mentioned says that, but also says the diary and movement are approved, which the site also says. So, I was correct in saying the site would give have given them the info they needed. You can follow the movement, read the dairy, but considering she is not approved yet, just be prepared in case the Church delves further and finds she is not a real mystic. If she is later approved, well and good! Hurray! If not, just be prepared to stop spreading her book should the Church say so, etc.

      Delete
  20. +JMJ+

    Re:"What has compounded the confusion regarding Medjegorje is the apparition site has been given official permission to operate as a pilgrim site despite the glaring errors of the later messages, the observation being that one does not need to have an apparition at all at a place to designate it an official shrine and hold pilgrimages, which is true, but to permit official pilgrimages while there are still serious unresolved problems regarding an official declaration of the apparitions is also clouding the issue"


    The fact that the Vatican allows Official Pilgrimages to Medjugorje and approves a permanent Apostolic Visitor to be there should not "confuse" the issue, but, on the contrary, Clarify that the opinions you have cited are incorrect, since they are contrary to the Church's stance on Medjugorje.

    It is only according to the incorrect statements about Medjugorje which you cite, that the Vatican's actions "are confusing."

    It shows how blind one can become by clinging to false testimony - that when the Church Approves Official Pilgrimages to Medjugorje, people still continue to say that Medjugorje is heretical.

    The explanations and conclusions of the sources you cite oppose the Official Church stance on Medjugorje. You either accept that, or you oppose the Church - the choice is yours.

    Simply by Obedience to Holy Mother Church, your stance should now be clear, and you need to remove the anti-Medjugorje material on your website leading readers to take a stand in contradiction to the Church. Thanks be to God for Medjugorje's more than 40 Years of the Mother of God Leading us out of Slavery, through the Desert, to the Promised Land of the Triumph of Her Heart and the Reign of the Sacred Heart.

    Live and Learn.

    Pax Christi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, there still is a whole mess of problems with Medjugorje which is why I am keeping it on the 'suspect' list in that: 1) the Church Commission agrees the first 7 apparitions MAY be supernatural, but won't declare on it yet. So, there is NO OFFICIAL DECLARATION yet on the visions, 2) they suspect the rest after that is NOT supernatural. 3) The Commission and / or the Vatican has seemed to stall on making an official ruling to declare what we may believe about Medj. and what we can't, and 4) the visionaries are reported as having given out heretical messages, which is probably why the Commission suspects the rest of their reported visions after the first seven are not supernatural. Of course, as pilgrims still go there, it is up to the Church to still provide the sacraments for its people and have therefore given permission for it to be run like a pilgrim site and have prayers, etc, as all prayer is good, but people assume the permission for running it like a pilgrim site equals approval, when it DOES NOT. This does NOT mean the visions are officially approved yet, neither does having an Apostolic Visitor present there make them approved, hence more added confusion. It's not uncommon the local bishop may give permission for prayers and shrines to be run at a mystical site like a pilgrim site until it is fully investigated, this is called 'expression of faith approval' but the Church can pull permission if it finds the place is not authentic later. Such has happened with a fake visionary in Brazil, the pilgrim site 'faith approval' status with that shrine was revoked by the Vatican itself. What I am saying is, Medj. is still in such confusion, and not approved, even with its pilgrim site status and Apostolic Visitor so that I am keeping it in the 'suspect' list for now until the Church finally comes to a decision and declares it once and for all 'supernatural' and weeds out what is not supernatural.

      Delete
    2. I recently came back from Medjugorje—having not been there in nine years!—and what an unspeakable honor it was for me, returning as a priest for the first time and being able to preach at Mass. It is through Our Lady’s apparitions in Medjugorje, reading about them as a college student, that I received my conversion, calling, and vocation to the priesthood.

      It was also a joy to lead 37 college students on the pilgrimage, students from our study-abroad campus in Austria, where I am currently living and ministering. Here is a link to the full homily, recorded live and streamed on MaryTV. 

      Thank you, Jesus and Mother Mary


      Father Daniel Maria Klimek, T.O.R., is a Franciscan friar and an Assistant Professor in the theology department at the Franciscan University of Steubenville. He is a member of the theological commission of the International Marian Association, and has taught as a Lecturer in the School of Franciscan Studies at St. Bonaventure University. He received his Ph.D. in spirituality with distinction from the Catholic University of America, and a Master of Divinity and a Master of Philosophy from the Catholic University of America, and a Master of Arts in Religion from Yale Divinity School. Father Daniel Maria is a recognized authority on Medjugorje, the subject of his dissertation. His book, Medjugorje and the Supernatural: Science, Mysticism, and Extraordinary Religious Experience, was published by Oxford University Press and has been nominated for the Distinguished Book Award for 2018 by the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion.

      Originally from Chicago, Father Daniel Maria is bilingual, coming from a Polish-American family and having lived in Krakow, Poland, for a few years as a child before moving back to Chicago. His pursuit for a priestly vocation was inspired by Our Lady’s intercession and by a deeper experience of the Holy Spirit after being baptized in the Spirit while in graduate school in Washington, D.C.

      Father Daniel Maria’s writings have appeared in Aleteia, the Federalist, the Huffington Post, Patheos, Church Pop, Mother of All Peoples, Mystic Post, Shalom Tidings magazine, MinistryValues, MedjugorjeToday, Spirit of Medjugorje, and Medjugorje.org. He has been featured on Radio Maria (USA), Radio Veritas, MaryTV, the documentary film Queen of Peace, and has spoken at the National Medjugorje Conference at the University of Notre Dame, and has presented academic papers at the University of Texas at Austin and at Yale Divinity School.

      Father Daniel Maria’s writings have been translated into Italian, Croatian, Polish, German, Spanish, Korean, and Indonesian. His scholarly articles have been published in Franciscan Connections: The Cord – A Spiritual Review, Glossolalia, and the Encyclopedia of Global Religion. Father Daniel Maria is a friar with the Franciscan Friars of the Third Order Regular of the Province of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus.

      http://www.danielklimek.com


      Delete
  21. Okay, but ALL that still means the apparition of Medj. has not been fully approved by the Church itself - until then, it is still not approved, it doesn't matter how many priests or even bishops write about how 'good' they think it is, or even about all the good they see a place do, until the proper authorities in the Church itself that have the power to say so declare it 'supernatural' - this includes the local bishop, and, the Holy See which has the authority to go over the local bishop's head if necessary, but the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith have not made a formal pronouncement yet. Still waiting for that to come in. So, I can quite confidently keep Medj. on the suspect list until that definite approval comes.

    Please remember: Until we know once and for all if Medj. is truly and officially approved, Satan knows how to make an apparition site look real by using the good fruits of prayer from believers, prayer produces good fruit, so Satan also uses it to his own advantage--that's why a lot of fake mystics he uses promote the Rosary, etc. Marie-Julie Jahenny warned apparitions would come out of Hell like flies before the chastisements, and Satan would get so good and making his fake visions look so real, he will lead many astray with them, including a lot of religious, so best in these times to wait for the authority of the Church to officially weigh in on an apparition site or mystic.

    Also, approved apparitions are not DOGMA. We are not even required to believe an approved apparition to be saved, and that includes the big ones, like Fatima, Lourdes, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hi, I read in the book, "We are Warned", that there will be 2 days of darkness as a sign that the 3 days of darkness will shortly arrive thereafter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Tanmara, yes, that's true according to Marie-Julie Jahenny. There will be a 'Two Days of Darkness', it will resemble the Three Days in that nothing will light but the blessed 100% beeswax candles, however, you won't be killed if you look outside during the 2 Days. It will be the last major warning.

      About 37 days later, the Three Days will strike and that is when you DO NOT LOOK OUT. All windows must be blocked off so you can't see out. The Three Days will happen on a Thursday, Friday, and a Saturday.

      Delete
  23. Do you think we are getting close to the chastisements now that Russia has invaded Ukraine and the new consecration has taken place? Inflation is high and there is talk of food shortages and WW3.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The 'ultimate' chastisements and final purification before the Age of Peace, possibly. We are not given an exact day or date in the prophecies, just overall signs...we won't know for sure until we see the supernatural warnings, such as those predicted by Marie-Julie Jahenny, then Paris, France and Italy falling apart afterwards.

      Delete
  24. Greetings. What's your opinion about André de Biase? There are videos on the YouTube claiming he is the great catholic monarch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Never heard of him before, and I'm only finding info on the Brazilian actor right now.... Whoever he is, he is obviously not the Great Monarch. We already know who the Monarch is according to the prophecies that have given his name - Henry V, 'Prince Dieudonné', the 'Miracle Child', and no other. This is to make sure the faithful don't fall for imposters. Anyone who pops up claiming to be the Great Monarch, especially with no great miracles announcing his coming, or the promised great deeds he will accomplish, and does not fulfill this criteria above regarding the name, is obviously fake.

      Delete
    2. (Clarification: I meant to point out if he himself claimed to be the Monarch, then he is an obvious fake, I don't know if he has yet), I've only just found some info, and already it is obvious he cannot be the Monarch in any case. He is not of the royal house of France to begin with, but from a modest working Italian family, and so cannot take the French throne or restore it, and is definitely not Henry V of the prophecies, which point out to him arriving in the 19th century as well as our own time. Henry V of the Royal house of France is destined to fulfil this. As to Blaise being a real mystic or not... I don't know yet...always be cautious!

      Delete
    3. Update - I can't tell if he is a real mystic or not, but the little info I found says he just gave a prophecy of the King coming, a King who will be great leader and will bring peace, Andre himself is not claiming to be the King as far as I can tell. So, whoever said Andre is actually the king is way off the mark.

      Again, as I said, I don't know if this man is a real mystic or not, but the other credible prophecies on this timeline show we must be getting very close to something happening in any case.

      Just be cautious with regards to mystics that appear now in our times because Marie-Julie warned before the chastisements and the restoration many fake mystics would come like a swarm of flies out of Hell to distract the faithful from the real Church-approved visions and mystics and lead them astray.

      Delete
  25. Thank you. I am in the process of repenting and coming back to the Church. Should we avoid the Novus Ordus Mass, or attend the Traditional Mass? . Please help me, I just want to please the Lord. There is so much confusion now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi - welcome back, don't delay, please return as SOON AS POSSIBLE to the Church! The Bible says do not delay from day to day coming back to the Lord. About the confusion in the Church: this is my personal 'what to do' list which I follow. If you have a Latin Mass near you, (but not run by Sedevacantists, Sedevacantism is a serious error, even a heresy), - attend a Latin Mass first and foremost if you can, the Latin Mass is our true Catholic heritage and Tradition, the Latin Mass is far more reverential. If you have never attended a Latin Mass, try and find one and you'll see what I mean. (Having a church near you up to an hour's travel distance is considered close enough to you to fulfill church obligations of attending Mass. So, if you have a Latin Mass even at an hours distance, it is worth the sacrifice.) If you don't have any Latin Mass near you, and for some reason you can't drive far for even an hour a certain Sunday for whatever reason, etc, the Novus Ordro is STILL VALID to fulfill the Sunday obligations etc, IF the priest is following the rubrics correctly and saying the NO according to the rules of the Church and not 'messing around' with the forms on a liberal whim. E.g. purposely leaving out parts or messing around with the Mass invalidates the Mass. This is the problem with 'Modern' parishes, you can end up in a real liberal one where they actually invalidate the sacraments by leaving out the Creed at the times it should be said, or even leaving out the penitential part, or even 'changing up' the Consecration! etc. They turn it into a spectacle for the people. Try and find the most reverent NO parish you have in your area that does things properly, even if not in Latin. (Note: Eucharistic miracles are still happening at NO Masses, giving evidence of their validity, and, demons during exorcisms obey even NO ordained priests, meaning the demons recognize the authority given to them by the Church, meaning their orders are valid, etc. Demons do NOT recognise anyone who has not been granted authority from the Church. This is in the Bible, demons attacked those who tried to do exorcisms, but were not sent by the Church to exorcise.) Hope this helps. God Bless.

      Delete
  26. Is my understanding correct that the Great Monarch doesn’t come until Paris is destroyed? Is there any indication when this will happen?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi – the prophecies indicate the Great Monarch will publicly appear with his armies about the time when the civil wars of France and Italy reach their most destructive phase, he will battle his way into France, but it will be swift - sometime during the 'third phase'. Paris is destroyed at the end of this phase. So, we have 'general indications' of what to look for, but the prophecies do not give exact dates. Most of what we have been told is already put on the Timeline here. There fact we have the two popes as foretold when this will break out, and we're at the end of St. Malachy's timeline where he predicts a great chastisement, and, we're at the very tip end of Sr. Royer of the Nativity's timeline, should tell us we're close enough to events happening. Alois Irlmaier's short timeline is interesting, too.

      Delete
  27. The Great Monarch has free will. He doesn’t owe anybody anything, and he isn’t obligated to say yes to God. He chooses what he wants for his life. Prophecy this prophecy that. It matters not. You like to believe that it’s a man return from the grave but that man was told by the visionary of la salette he would never sit on the throne. The man everybody is searching for doesn’t care about them, because they don’t care about him. Nobody knows who he is but him, and those that think they know him don’t. He is unwanted, unloved, untrusted. So he returns what he gets from the human race. Forget your prophecies and start feeding the poor, clothing the naked, releasing the prisoners, etc. that is where you will find your King.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, we are to do all those good deeds regardless of God foretelling He will send a King to bring the Age of Peace or not. That's our basic duty. Christ is King of all kings, and has laid down the laws we are to live by.

      The crux of the matter is regarding the Great Monarch: Our Lord told Marie-Julie Jahenny He wanted His people warned of all the chastisements and what was coming, so yes, He wanted people to pay attention to the prophecies given her, which include the coming of the Great Monarch. The promised Age of Peace and the Triumph of the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts and the restoration of the Church is to come through him and the Angelic Pontiff. This is what God wants, and, a true holy king who desires to do God's will is not going to say “no” to this. St. Paul said to not despise prophecies if they prove true, and everything Marie-Julie has predicted is coming to pass, bit by bit.

      And, Henri V the 'Miracle Child' is still the Great Monarch, we have two approved mystics who literally named him, and there would be no other. God says pay attention to two or more witnesses sent in His Name. Ven. Sr. Bourg, who is on her way to sainthood, and Marie-Julie Jahenny, mystic declared 'supernatural' by the Church, meaning she is an authentic mystic. About the king being unknown unloved, unwanted, etc – that occurred during Henry V's lifetime. The true King rejected by France and having his throne openly usurped by Louis-Philippe with the help of the 'Chamber of Hell' described in Marie-Julie's prophecies. The King then lost his throne for defending the White Flag, even the Pope couldn't understand Henry, and, he was mocked for loving the white flag, when the Flag stands for the defense of Catholicism in France! It is all explained in Marie-Julie's prophecies, the other prophecies, and the history of Henry V. See more here:

      https://marie-juliejahenny.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_27.html

      Also, I do not trust one iota of what Maximin possibly said to Henry V – (I haven't written on this yet,), but, what he possibly said to Henry V is going on the Suspect list on this blog when I get around to it. Maximin, whose conduct after La Salette was scandalous, himself admitted his own actions did much that would have discredited the apparition of Our Lady, but thankfully it was indeed real and was would rise above his bad actions. After La Salette, he was quite ignorant of politics and barely even knew who the current king of his day was, got mixed up with a group of political intriguers who made him disobedient to his own local bishop, people who claimed an English imposer was the real Louis XVII, and obviously filled Maximin's head with a lot of historical nonsense regarding who the real heir to the French throne was, etc, so I'm sure that tripe is what he told Henry V, i.e. that Louis XVII was still possibly alive, judging from the conspiracy babble he picked with that bunch of political intriguers. Maximin admitted he hung around a bad crowd that got him into trouble. So Henry V believed him, which was a shame, because even St. John Bosco knew Henry was the real king and supposed to rule France. Melanie also got it wrong, she thought it was another proven impostor who the real heir to the French throne, but was way off the mark, so Our Lady did not reveal the name of the future King to them, but his name was revealed to Marie-Julie and Ven. Sr. of Bourg, whom I believe on that point. Even when all the prophecies from the other saints and mystics are taken together, the king will come BOTH in the 19th centuries and sometime during the 20th or 21st.. Marie-Julie Jahenny explained how.

      Of course, we don't have to believe any of this for salvation itself, but, we have been told what is coming, and it's wise to pay heed to God's warnings regarding the events coming.

      As St. Bernadette said: I can only inform and not convince.

      Delete
  28. An Alignment has taken place….

    Sunday May 8th, 2022
    Feast of Joan of Arc (France)
    Feast of Apparition of St. Michael at San Gargano
    End of World War 1
    End of World War 2
    Mother’s Day (U.S)

    Sunday May 30, 2022
    Feast of Joan of Arc
    Memorial Day
    Mothers Day (Nicaragua).

    ReplyDelete
  29. *Monday May 30 2022

    ReplyDelete
  30. What is the significance of this comment?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you asking the significance of the comment or the significance of the alignment? Those are two very different questions.

      Delete
  31. Greetings my brother in Christ, Mr. Bucchianeri. I am a Catholic in Indonesia simply desiring to serve God and His Divine Will. Do we have any idea what will happen to my country? I read the timeline that the Great Monarch shall root out republics, to what extent will he do this? Will the entire world be brought under his rule or only a part of the world and some parts simply agreed to cooperate with his rule? There's also the fact that Indonesia has a Muslim majority population so perhaps that majority may be converted as well in the Era of Peace?

    That was my first question, my second question is more of a statement. I want to warn the Catholics of my country as it seems very few Catholics in my country know about the coming chastisements, which as the timeline suggests, is way too near. I plan on undertaking all of the spiritual work for spiritual protection as mentioned in the timeline, such as devotions and the Rosary and other works. I am planning on consulting these prophecies to my local priest on Tuesday. Depending on that meeting, I may or may not start sharing this blog to my other brothers and sisters in Christ. Do you have any opinion about this or advice for me?

    Thank you very much for this blog in advance. You are doing the Lord's work. I shall pray for you. May God bless you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello. Regarding the Great Monarch and Indonesia: it's hard to say exactly what is going to happen in each specific country unless literally stated in a prophecy. We do know that Great Monarch's influence is going to extend greatly through the world, republics will be toppled, and he will have a fr-reaching Empire – only a few kings will rule under him, and, he won't allow them to rule in their countries unless they become Catholic, so their influence will probably spread as well, how, we just don't know. I'm guessing colonies again? Or, perhaps countries will be permitted some form of self rule under the King? Hard to say. And yes, there will be major world wide conversions during his reign thanks to the miracles that will announce his arrival, and which will no doubt continue during his rule.

      Re: about warning people and trying to get prepared – yes we need to do that to the best of our ability. Our Lord said He wanted His people warned – however, if there are people in the world who reject the Gospels themselves, just be prepared for some people to think you're a little crazy as well with regard to the prophecies. Not everyone will believe the prophecies or prepare, unfortunately. It will be like those who laughed at Noah while he built the ark. We can only inform, not convince. Best thing is to pray for conversions as well. Sinners who convert will hopefully get the grace to know what they need to do. Thank you for the prayers, they are very much appreciated! God Bless.

      Delete
  32. Hello.

    Firstly, I’d like to thank you for compiling this great list of approved prophecy and mystics. As someone who is just starting to learn about Catholic mysticism, this list has been incredibly helpful in figuring out true vs. false prophets etc.

    I was surprised that Our Lady of Fatima was not in the timeline. Is there a reason for this, or have you just not gotten there yet? No pressure if you haven’t, ofc.

    Also, there are some things about a “Reign of Mary” floating out on the internet, as well as some stuff about a “Bagarre”, whatever that is. But it’s harder to find info about this compared to the more prominent stuff like Secrets of Fatima, Good Success, Days of Darkness, etc.

    Is there anything too these prophecies (or rumors of prophecy) about a “Bagarre” and “Reign of Mary”? Or is it just more internet hogwash.

    Thank you in advance, and may the powerful intercession of Our Lady bring forth many blessings in your life!

    PS. This is really high quality (or as we zoomers say, based) stuff. You should consider writing a book lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi – Re Fatima: it just isn't up yet, not that I don't plan to place a page sometime, but the warnings of Fatima are so well known in comparison with other apparitions and prophecies, this blog was set up to find and promote the Great Monarch / Angelic Pontiff prophecies and other apparitions or prophecies that are related but not as well known, and also to debunk the fakes floating around out there.


      Re about a 'Bagarre' – the term means 'brawl' or 'fight', and was used in France during the Catholic and Protestant fighting that turned very bloody in the late 18th century at Nimes. However, the use of the term in a prophecy seems to have been used by a 'cult' in the 1980s, but I can't seem to find anything. about it other than that, so it's not a legit Catholic prophecy from a credible mystic. There will however be a bloody civil war that will break out in France when the apostate state religion will be introduced just before or during the appearance of the Great Monarch.

      As to the 'Reign of Mary' - could be in reference to the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart promised at Fatima, and also a reference to St Marie Louis de Monfort's observation that Our Lady will have great influence during the last period of time. Also, Marie-Julie Jahenny was told it will be Our Lady / the Immaculate Heart that will chose the time of the Peace and the arrival of the Great Monarch. So, yes, it will be her 'reign', in union with the Sacred Heart.

      Re – a book, way too much info, and no one would buy the thing then, it would be too big. LOL! Marie-Julie's prophecies alone take up quite a few pages!

      Delete
  33. Did Hitler believe he was the Great Monarch? Did the Antisemitic tones in the Visions of Anne Catherine Emmerich written by Clemens Brentano influence Hitler to become Antisemitic? According to Mein Kampf he was not originally antisemitic until he arrived in Vienna. Was the Cold War and Space Race to some extant influenced by her writings about the moon and this explains why we never went back? It is a well known fact that the CIA was deeply tied to the Vatican as well as the KGB being tied to the Orthodox Church. Perhaps the finding of the house in Ephesus added fuel to the fire of post war Europe igniting the Second World War and beyond. It is also a known fact that the Nazis were spiritualists, especially the SS and that perhaps the reason they were in the Himalayas is that they were searching for Elijah on Prophet Mountain, as stated in the writings. Is the Vatican now hesitant to embrace any ideology regarding the prophecies of the Great Monarch due in some extent to the effects of World War II. This is all circumstantial of course, but it appears that World War II could have merely been a case of mistaken identity. This might explain the Vaticans hesitancy to outright condemn Nazi Germany, and it’s hesitancy now to back anything related to the Great Monarch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi – I don't know where this is going (?) but Hitler “possibly” thought he was going to be some 'destined leader' aka like Napoleon, but whether or not he thought he was the Great Monarch, who knows. The prophecies say the King will come from France, the last of the French kings, so if Hitler did think he'd be the Great Monarch, he was definitely delusional. Those in the Church who were aware of the prophecies must have known Hitler wasn't the king as well. The one reason the Church doesn't really promote such prophecies as far as I can see is for centuries the Church has had to be on the watch for Chiliasm and the Millenarian heresy, as these prophecies of the King and the Age of Peace can be twisted out of context into those heresies pretty easily by other delusional people, namely, fake mystics, etc. Also, quite a number of the prophecies condemn the corrupt clergy in the Church, so of course the modernists nowadays don't want to focus on these prophecies - the King and the Angelic Pontiff comes to restore all after the chastisements, so, of course, they don't want to deal with this. My two cents, anyway. God Bless.

      Delete
  34. Dear EA Bucchianeri, I always read your articles and comments with Great Interest because of the undoubted care that you put into your research so I followed the link that you placed with regards the writings of Marie-Julie Jahenny. Your comments with regard to Henry V were mind-boggling though no doubt well within the limitless Power of Almighty God. Would you be willing to test those comments by utilising my skill as a Reverse Speech Investigator. You can reply to me direct via email at lauriemyers86@gmail.com if you are willing to accept this challenge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello, Re: regarding Henry V – he has been named by two mystics, and the majority of the credible prophecies all point to him once his name has been identified: I just share what I personally see based on their texts, and I don't go any further than this as it only leads to endless circles as people think I am trying to 'convince' them – I only inform, I can't convince.

      It is only helpful to know as we can spot and dismiss the impostors right away, and not get led away by a fake and / or the delusional – Yves Dupont was plagued by people claiming to be the king after he wrote his book on the prophecies, and already I've had nutters e-mail me saying they are they Great Monarch, so being able to know his real identity based on the revelations themselves stops that right away. So, while I may be insistent on pointing out the details given us, this is only to show that yes, we will have a King, and Heaven did give us a certain amount of details. God wanted His people warned, and that also includes the prophecies of the King.

      However, in the end, the prophecies themselves say only a few will understand and see in any case who the King is, the King's identity will be hidden from them, even after and despite all the descriptions given by Heaven itself, which come right down to the King's name, number and nick names in Marie-Julie's prophecies and those of Ven. Bourg, and that he will 'be returned' by God's power alone as he is 'reserved for the great epochs'. So, attempting to convince people who can't be convinced is not going to get anyone anywhere! If anyone doesn't think my observations are possible, or the very apparitions themselves are credible, they don't have to believe them as we are not required to believe any private apparition or prophecy for salvation. When the miracles start happening, all will know who the king is then. I just share what I've noticed based on the mystics' own words. God bless.

      Delete
    2. Question? Let’s say you are right and he returns from the dead. What’s to stop someone from shooting him in the head and sending him right back to where he came from?

      Delete
    3. Perhaps something called Divine protection? I don't think God would allow a chosen soul like that who has had centuries of prophecies given about him to be popped off like that and not complete the mission entrusted to him! He won't die until his mission is accomplished.

      Delete
  35. Yes, I was always wondering about the 3rd secret of Fatima. I saw something on FB that said the chastisements will come in 2025. But reading this blog has made me aware that we should not believe in prophecies that have a date in it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. P.S. I meant to put that the 3rd secret of Fatima apparently said that chastisements will come in 2025. Have you heard of anything like this?

      Delete
    2. Hi - none of the legit Fatima messages / prophecies mention the year “2025” as the literal time of the chastisements, from what I've read. But, I see there are a lot of people who are trying to guess the timing of the chastisements using the dates of the apparitions of Fatima for some reason. However, Bl. Emmerick said the devil would be set loose about 50 or 60 years before the year 2000 AD but would prepare long before that, then compare that revelation with Pope Leo's vision the devil would be given about 100 years to do his worst, (some accounts say this time will be cut short, so this accounts for him given 75 years in some texts, or the 'loose' time frame of 75 to 100 years). Someone probably took this and applied it to 'Fatima' – I've seen quite a bit of guesswork 'floating' around on the Internet and pinned to Fatima when none of the messages mention what some people are claiming, even the dubious version of the 'leaked 3rd Secret'! People like to tack stuff on to saints or real apparitions, such as attributing a load of chastisement prophecies to St. Padre Pio who himself said he never made such prophecies. It happens, people do stuff like this with the hope people convert, despite the dubious means. God Bless.

      Delete
  36. You are correct in your assessment…the Great Monarch is watching over humanity….he is Henry V count of Chambourd. He is going to return from the grave….sincerely Kevin Michael Jones

    ReplyDelete
  37. Henry did not abandon me. He is my King and I worship the God that anointed him. My name is Kevin Michael Jones and my King is Henri Count of Chanboud

    ReplyDelete
  38. I am promoting the Vision of the Holy Family of Our Lady of Tilly... Where is the original painting/image so I can publish and carve it into wood?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, sorry, I don't know where the original painting is.

      Delete
  39. Can you provide your opinion on Garabandal? Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have just posted a page on this - I have to put it in the 'Suspect' category for now:

      https://greatmonarch-angelicpontiffprophecies.blogspot.com/p/apparitions-of-garabandal-1961-1965.html

      Delete
  40. If you believe in the Great Monarch, why are you a Trump supporter? Isn't that a bit conflicted considering that Donald Trump is a diehard believer in Americanism? To my understanding the principles of America directly conflict with Divine Right of Kings. Granted the Americans did not commit regicide like the French and the Russians, but the system of democracy they created is anathema to Divine Right of Kings. For example, Freedom of speech and the press, separation of Church and State, freedom of religion (at least on a governmental level), voting, and the principle of equality etc... It appears to me that you don't really believe in the Great Monarch, because the things you stand for are in conflict with his being. I'm not trying to be a jerk, I am just trying to understand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do not mistake supporting Trump as some sort of endorsement of democracy against the Divine Right of Kings: we are required to stop evil from happening in our countries that conflicts with the laws of God. It is for that reason Pius XII ordered Catholics during one crucial election in Italy to vote from the pro-Catholic candidate and against the anti-Catholic politician and not stay home and not vote or they would be incurring mortal sin.


      Since the only government we have in the USA right now is a republic which requires voting out evil when seen and placing someone in office who might hopefully do what God wants, then you are required to do what you can, even it means voting democratically when you are a die-hard monarchist at heart, or you are committing the sin of omission to do good, especially in one such instance - stopping the laws from permitting the as something as the horrific crime of abortion as a 'right', which is one of the sins bringing chastisements down on the world.

      Look at the fruit: Trump successfully placed a majority of pro-life judges in the Supreme Court, was the first ever President to make an appearance in the March for Life, and we have seen Roe vs Wade overturned not long after, which I didn't think would happen for a while yet if at all. In this alone a vote was not misplaced in his regard. Putting a wrench into the pro-abort culture may have bought us some time and hold off the chastisements a little longer. We also had a President permit a Catholic priest to exorcise and bless the White House, not to mention he brought Christmas back to the White House after the debacle of a mess with Obama suppressing the Day of Prayer, etc etc.

      Delete
  41. Do you think aliens exist? Are there any saints that have commented about it? I recently heard Padre Pio said something about aliens might existing and also Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich saying other life being out there as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have not heard of saints mentioning aliens from other planets, nor has Bl Catherine Emmerick mentioned anything like that either for that matter, I have not seen any such things in her writings, perhaps someone is twisting what she said about the Garden of Eden being 'lifted' off this planet away from sinful mankind so it doesn't defile it – (could be twisted to mean life on an alien planet, when in fact it is still 'earth'.)


      Apparently, there is no proof Padre Pio actually said that about aliens either.

      Here is an interesting article on the subject:
      https://www.kolbecenter.org/would-extraterrestrial-intelligent-life-redound-to-the-glory-of-god/

      This article shows such a 'statement' apparently conflicts with the teachings of the Church, so I doubt he ever made such a statement, it sounds like another one of the 'Three Days of Darkness prophecies attributed to him, which he never made.

      Delete
  42. How about the prophecies/messages given or are from saints ? If I am not wrong, some/many of them have not been approved by the Catholic Church in the process of becoming a Servant of God/Venerable/Blessed/Saint. If I am not wrong, one of the examples is Blessed Catherine Emmerich.

    Can I share the prophecies/messages attributed to them, what is the difference between them and straight up unapproved, so called claimed visionaries and mystics ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Regarding writing or prophecies from blesseds and saints during the canonization process, approval of such texts, and if we can still share them, etc.

      Bl. Catherine Emmerich's writings were not outright condemned, since they were not written by her personally, they simply could not be part of her canonization process as the Church must judge the personal life of a person undergoing the scrutiny of canonization, and this includes what they personally wrote. Texts written by scribes or other people can have additions or 'mishearings' added to them, so they are not considered during a process, but they still can be read by the laity, etc. There is only a caution with regards to Bl. Emmerich's texts as they 'could' have been added to by the writer Clemens Brentano who wrote them, but they cannot be absolutely certain. But as long as there is no official condemnation against them, we can share them. We just have to have 'discernment' when reading them.

      The same has happened with Marie-Julie Jahenny – because scribes have written her texts and not her, there is a 'caution' issued in their regard, but she or the texts to date have not been officially condemned. She herself was observed to be under supernatural influence, meaning, from heaven.

      What we cannot share or spread is a text or revelation that has an outright official condemnation against it from the Church, from either the local bishops or the Congregation of the Faith in Rome, that is, until the Church lifts the condemnation. This has happened in the past as with the case of Venerable Mary of Agreda's famous book of revelations, 'The Mystical City of God', and St. Faustina's Diary about the Divine Mercy. Both were condemned at first due to bad translations which ended up adding heresies in the books, but then later the real texts were looked at again and it was discovered the translators had made a mess, not the mystic! The condemnations were lifted and proper translations put out.

      Hope this helps.


      Delete
  43. looking forward to your reply,

    Thank you very much :)

    ReplyDelete
  44. A lifetime ago I was in Garabandal...long story, and I decided to walk back to Cabezon de la sol....During the walk I decided to just be the Great Monarch, always wanted to be him, only because one prophecy said he was Dear to God's heart, and I wanted to be dear to God's heart..what can i say i am a simpleton..I had several hours thinking about my life through the mountains of Cantabria, and my pride kicked in and i said well the prophecy says he will fight first in France, so I will go to Paris and go to war....Never been there before so i spent the last of my money on a bus ticket, and showed up homeless with the clothes on my back....I didn't have a plan, just you know start the revolution, so I figured I would take the high ground...So I started following the incline of the streets. If the streets went up so, did I, if it was a decline I avoided that direction. After many hours I made it to the highest point of Paris...You know what is at the highest point that I found, because i wasn't expecting it.....the Basilica of the Sacred Heart....LMFAO...I went and prayed and left for a thousand other disappointing ventures....

    ReplyDelete
  45. Does "Anne, a Lay Apostle" belong on your Suspect list. And if so can you please add her?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who has given this woman authority to investigate these matters. I believe Garabandal is under the jurisdiction of the Bishop of Santander, as well Medjugorje is now a matter for the Vatican, as far as I know the magisterium have never made a public declaration on whether or not there is any authenticity to the Great Monarch prophecies. Proof in point there are two canonized saints that disagreed about a Pope and an Anti-Pope.

      Delete
    2. I've never pretended to be anything other than a layperson just attempting to make sense of the various prophecies using my research skills, and as St. Pio noted, the graces God gives is persoanlly are for us alone but we are to share with others. So here is my 'two-cents' worth regarding what I've found regarding prophecies. We may use the steps and quidelines used by the Church to do so. Note: I never said Garabandal wasn't under the authority of the Bishop of Santander, I have published his ruling, and I've done the same for Medjugorje, I've listed the Church proceedings on those, but, people have asked for my opinion on what I've noticed as well. I list the reasons I am not including certain 'not yet condemned' visions in the Tiimeline until the Church rules on them as 'supernatural', there is no sin in being suspicious of anything not yet approved, and, we may personally investigate or study anything that is not condemned - which includes the Great Monarch prophecies. Since, as you noted the Vatican has not made any public declaration on them, we can still look into them. You don't have to believe them as they are still private revelations after all, but the prophecies about an 'emperor' or Great Monarch and Angelic Pontiff have persisted for quite some time, several centuries in fact, beginning with a number the Church Fathers. It would not be wise to ignore them since we do have saints and approved mystics that agree they will be sent.

      Delete
  46. I've seen a post somewhere that said that the Great Monarch was already fulfilled in Charles de Gaulle. Any thoughts on that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Whoever said that clearly doesn't know how the French monarchy works let alone did not pay attention to the details of the credible prophecies. Of interest, Our Lord told Marie-Julie Jahenny that de Gaulle was a leader of lies and deceit and that His eyes 'were upon him', meaning his deceits and cunning were not hidden from Him. The 'Marquis' de Franquerie found a source written by a Freemason saying de Gaulle sided with the Freemasons during the war and promised to give France back to them. You can read about that near the end of the biography of Marie-Julie Jahenny here:

      https://marie-juliejahenny.blogspot.com/2017/09/about-marie-julie-jahenny-breton.html

      Obviously, he is not the Great Monarch.

      Delete
    2. FYI here is the post, I found it. Search the text for Charles de Gaulle. Mentions other supposed fulfillments as well. Any thoughts you have on this are appreciated. While I don't subscribe to this view, I find his presentation to be serious and credible enough to be worthy of consideration and possible refutation.

      Delete
  47. and here's the url: https://www.arcaneknowledge.org/catholic/lasalette.htm

    ReplyDelete
  48. I see you do have several articles of prophies from visionaries that have not been approved. so have you studied the Garabandal visionaries their apparitions and interviews. Conchita who is 72 and will announce the date of the Mirical and lives in New York. One of the messages is the same as Akita. When I get time I will find them and send them to you. The second message caused particular controversy when it was revealed that Conchita had actually written "many cardinals, many bishops and many priests are following the road to perdition." She was asked many times to verify this information. The young woman stated many times that Mary stressed the importance of the priesthood, and focused attention on priests above others.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've put up a page on Garabandal, until the Church formally rules on that apparition as 'supernatural', which it has not, I've had to put it in the suspect list for now.

      Delete
  49. Hello EA, I just like to know what is your opinion about the book "Warnings from the Beyond: Confessions of Hell" revelations made by the demons Akabor, Allida, Judas Iscariot, Verona, and Beelzebub during a series of exorcisms' from 1975 to 1978 in Switzerland. This extraordinary event, give approval of unapproved apparition of BVM namely Garabandal, San Damiano, Montichari & Fontanelle, etc. And giving condemnation of apparition in Medjugorje from 80s exorcism (from other book) and false mystics.

    And giving very valuable instructions to the faithful to pray rosary, to make station of the cross, to have great devotion to Mary & St Joseph, Sacred Hearts, Angels, and pray so much for Souls in Purgatory. And encourage to have pious book like Imitation of Christ by Thomas K., to read Mystical City of God (history of Mary) by Ven. Mary of Agreda(mystic), the prophecies of Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich (Stigmatist & mystic) and her book about the Passion of Christ and telling this two Virgin is a great hidden Saint that Heaven wanted to be canonized and known and their books/writings must be distributed everywhere. And the demon said most of the prophecies given to Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich were fulfilled regarding the suffering pope (undentify by the demon which is Pope Paul VI), false church, false ecumenism, heresy, changing traditions, etc. etc. Her country Germany will become the enemy of the church together with Russia.


    Personally this book help me so much to know what must we all know about our current situation in the church and the world. The demon also confessed that the church is infiltrated by secret society namely freemasonry and communist group. And also the Bayside new york apparition is also authentic. I just want to know your opinion about this book and your discovery about it. And thank you so much for your great effort and time making this precious information about mystics especally Marie-Julie Jahenny and various apparitions to be spread. May God bless you and our Immaculate Virgin Mother Mary always protect and nourish you so much graces and favours under Her mantle. From Phil🇵🇭

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, I have not read that book, so I can't really give a comment on it per se as a review, but doing my best to judge from what you have just told me, this is VERY dangerous, and, I would not pay any attention to what demons say about apparitions, or any other matter, during an exorcism except when forced to reveal who they are so the priest can command them out: THEY ARE HORRIFIC LIARS and have fooled exorcists, yes, even when exorcists give them commands because if the priest himself is possibly getting too confident in himself and thinking the demon will just 'obey' him when he demands, even in the name of Heaven, then, human pride has entered in, the process gets twisted due to this human error and gives the demons a chance to actually lie.

      First of all, I can't help but personally see there is a serious dangerous trend happening with a number of exorcists after Vatican II: they try and get answers or confirmation regarding truth, morals, and Church teachings, and even and on apparitions which only the Church can rule on --- demons can and will lead people astray on this as we are to seek truth from the Holy Spirit and NOT BE SEEKIING IT FROM DEMONS. I find certain exorcists are tending to use exorcisms to get 'truths' and to confirm things, and that should NEVER be sought from a demon, or it is coming very dangerously close to seeking secrets in a occult fashion, twisting a sacramental power for the sake of knowledge, when it should only be sought from God and through the teaching authority of His Church.

      In the old days, the Church used to train exorcists NEVER to question demons during exorcisms except to get their name, how they possessed the person, and find out how best to get them out of the possessed person. The priest was NEVER to listen to whatever else the demon would spout because they could lie about anything, and it was extremely difficult to figure out when the demon would actually tell the truth or not. They are the most vicious and cunning mind twisters that no human can match unless protected by God as their angelic intelligence, even though fallen, is far superior to ours. Already from what you told me, the demons saying so many unapproved apparitions which contain heresies and properly denounced by the Church are being touted as 'true' by them are encouraging disobedience to Church rulings. I would NOT listen to whatever the demons say as they can also spout truth to cover up their lies and deceit, so just because they do give good advice regarding prayers and the rosary, etc, this DOES NOT mean everything they say is true. What we know is true we already know through Holy Mother the Church, we do NOT need nor should we ever try to seek it from demons as they are first and foremost lairs and have nothing to do with Truth, or they would not have been lost in the first place.

      Delete
    2. Hello EA Bucchianeri, first I want to thank you and God of course, for this amazing, extraordinary blog about Catholic prophecies and apparitions approved by the Catholic Church authority, and also about fake, dubious, and condemned apparitions, etc. I live in Croatia, and it's so hard to live and practise true Catholic faith and worship. I live about 100 km away from nearest TLM, offered by SSPX. With these gas prices, I could go there once a month or even less often sadly. In my local parish, friar prierst is a irreverent modernist who likes having girl altars, Holy Communion on the hand, sometimes preach blasphemy. Would you advise me to go nearest Novus ordo parish with reverend, orthodox priest, or to avoid completely Novus Ordo mass? I didn't attend Novus Ordo mass (or TLM) for months, and my mind is troubled because of 3rd commandment. I watched every Sunday live stream TLM mass, from SSPV, SSPX even CMRI. It's so confusing, I believe that Novus ordo priests and bishop are validly ordained despite changing the prayer. In my country every priest says this consecration prayer: "Take this, all of you, and drink from it, for this is the Chalice of My Blood of the new and eternal covenant, which will be poured out for you and for all for the forgiveness of sins. Do this in memory of me.
      I am aware of Eucharistic miracles confirmed by doctors, some of them were atheists who converted to catholicism. I have doubts that this consecration and words "for all" instead "for many" invalide mass. I asked some trad catholics on internet, they all think that is not valid consecration. I asked one conservative Novus ordo friar, he believes that is valid consecration but he said "it would be better that it sayed "for many" because that is in the Bible." Could you help me with this dillema, please? I don't know that to think or believe anymore...

      Delete
    3. Hi, I will try and answer this as best I can. I can only give the info and advice which I personally follow, so I hope it will help you in your situation. 1) If you can get to a Latin Mass said by a priest who is not a Sedevacantist, even SSPX, etc, then do please try to attend as much as possible. 2) If you cannot attend as often as possible, you are still required to go to Mass to fulfill the Sunday and feastday obligations. Watching Mass on TV does not fulfill that obligation. You are only dispensed from having to go to Mass if you are ill, or for a dire or valid unforseen reason that prevents you from going. While yes, the Novus Ordro has taken out a lot of the prayers and the consecration words are in question, at the same time, Eucharistic miracles are still happening at the N.O. Mass, showing that yes Our Lord is still present there, and so that Mass is being accepted by Heaven for now. Notice an N.O. priest can still cast out demons during exorcisms, and the demons will only obey the authority of those who have authority from the Church, meaning, the NO ordained priests still have church authority. The problem is, if a priest become too 'modernist' and tries to do his own thing with the New Mass, like leave out the parts that MUST be said, such as the Creed, or the rite of forgiveness at the beginning, I.e. Lord have Mercy and I confess to Almighty God, etc, then the Mass is invalid. If you have no alternative but to attend the NO, it is best to find the most reverent NO priest you can who says it properly according to the rubrics and attend his Mass. If you can find a priest who permits Communion on the tongue, wonderful! Attend that Mass. You can even attend an eastern orthodox rite as long as it is one of the rites that are in union with Rome, and not one of the schismatic eastern orthodox.

      Delete
    4. Thank you so much, I don't want to risk my salvation and disobey the God's Law, or valid priests. I didn't think I would get a reply to my comment. It was before a few weeks at least. I am close to accepting thesis called sedeprivationism, if I didn't make a mistake. Bishop Donald Sanborn explained it publicly more than few times. Modernist heretics in the hierarchy of the Catholic Church (including all post Vatican II popes) are formally outside of the Church, but not materially. Because they didn't separate and found one or more new "churches" like schismatic Orthodox or Protestant "churches". They hold offices and positions, like terrorists hijacking the airplane. Nevertheless, my duty is for my family members and myself. I don't want to participate in the Revolution pf the Catholic Church, and I think that going to Novus Ordo mass is just that. Francis wants to eliminate the TLM, not the Novus Ordo mass for a clear reason. Didn't Jesus told Marie Julie Jahenny that the Rome will create new mass with words odious to Him, from abyss of Hell? I know that in Talmud and Kabbalah, it is used the same prayer as the one of offertory prayers in the Novus Ordo Mass. Do you think that Devil can fake Eucharistic Miracles? Isn't that "seer" in South Korea saw hosts falling from the sky? I found that story on this blog under condemned apparitions as demonic, occult origin.

      Delete
    5. Please, do not believe the current heresy of Sedevacantism, I.e. that we have not had a valid pope for many decades, that goes against the teaching that there will always be a direct line of papal succession and the line will not be broken. If there is a supposed constant succession of 'non-valid' popes for decades as the Sedevacantists' claim that we've had no clear 'true pope' all this time, they then believe the line has been broken, which goes against the teachings of the Church. Even Marie-Julie Jahenny did not predict this type of 'empty seat' in the Church, her predictions say we will have a legitimate 'empty seat' period lasting for about 3 to 4 years when we will have no visible Pope during the wars in France and Italy, then the Angelic Pontiff will be elected shortly. We MUST NOT break from Papal unity she was told in her visions, which is what the evil bishops are going to do when things really hit the fan. I personally believe Pope Benedict is still legitimate pope, even the prophecies seem to point to this right now. But, as people are pointing out, what to do when if he passes right now and we're stuck with Pope Francis? Well, we've had a heretical pope in the far past, his teachings were later condemned by the pope elected after him, it is up to the successive pontiffs to declare when we've had an anti-pope, and a heretical one at that. So, we just continue doing what we personally know to be right ourselves according to all true Church teaching and wait for the Angelic Pontiff to be elected without placing ourselves out side the actual Church. I understand your not wanting to join the 'revolution' but it's not personally joining it – it is about fulfilling your obligations. We are required to go to Mass, and we need Confession. Just educate yourself on what is true Catholic teachings to not get confused with their modernist junk. The Catechism of Trent is a good book, so is the Exhaustive Explanation of the Catholic Faith by Spirago and Clarke, very Traditional. Yes, the devil can fake levitation miracles – dropping hosts out of the sky to Julia Kim is one, but that is not an authentic Eucharist miracle, and, we do not know if they were consecrated hosts. Possibly they are not as I cannot see God allowing the devil to drop Him out of the sky like that. But, the devil cannot transform bread into heart tissue itself, which is what happened with one Eucharistic Miracle during a NO Mass, I think in Poland? The host is stopped halfway right between the physical transformation of bread turning into human heart flesh of a man dying in agony, which is scientifically impossible to do, and the devil is not allowed to do Transubstantiation. The best you can do I believe is try and get to a Latin mass as often as you can, or, even an eastern rite in union with Rome, and if you can't as often, try and find a very conservative parish to attend Mass that doesn't do a lot of crazy stuff and allows Communion on the tongue. Of course, the NO is possibly a preparation for this, but the actual 'fake' Mass we have to be worried about according to Marie-Julie will come when countries turn red communist, which will start in France, and they impose a fake Christian religion resembling Islam, we will be killed if we refuse to join this state church, similar to what is happening in China right now. They will impose a new ecumenical type rite that will be celebrated in 'all houses' i.e. (all churches, not just Catholic), and will have an invalid 'consecration', of bread and water only, no wine. And, the 'priests' will wear red. We are not exactly there yet. But, if you are very, very worried about it, you may actually be called to do a big sacrifice and move closer to where you can get a Latin Mass, but that is something you must pray about and talk over with your family. That would be a big thing to decide on.

      Delete
    6. Hi, that is actually me answering above, E.A. Bucchianeri. I have no idea why the computer listed me as Anonymous! Better put my name in just in case it happens again now....

      Delete
    7. I thought that is you EA Bucchianeri. Thank you so much, I don't know why I and so many other catholics are obsessed determing who is and who is not a pope and why. It may come from devil, who knows. It occured to me when prof. E. Michael Jones told in a video that Satan used Bible to separate people from Catholic Church, only real Christ's Church. He used even appearance of Blessed Virgin Mary and rosaries to do just that, like in Medjugorje (I live about 45 min away by car in Croatia) or other false apparitions, locutions. The "seers" and friars disobeyed the two local bishops, and of course many millions of lay Catholics. I used to believe in that, went there with my family, but I searched for the truth (ready all messages from diary of Vicka) and thank God I don't believe in that demonic deception. All false seers became wealthy, earned money using religous tourism, etc.
      I think Garabandal is from Devil also because of night full of screams, walking so fast and backwards and "Our Lady" accepted only object which weren't blessed by the priest before that. And I think one of the false seers denied ectasies. Devil is so intelligent, and his demons can trick even excorcists like fr. Chad Ripperger.
      And when E. Michael Jones said that Devil can use the Latin Mass to separate laity and clergy from Catholic Church. I never thought it that way, but when so called "traditionalist" and sedevacantists a priori dismiss ALL Eucharistic miracles as demonic and false miracles, it was a red flag for me. We need to embrace our cross, Jesus is suffering in the NO mass, He is being trampled under foot. Maybe God allowed lockdowns of churches because of disgusting abominations in the NO mass, like clown masses, etc.
      We need to be with Christ through Passion, like Our Lady and St. John. Maybe God is testing the faith and will to suffer with Him knowing all about freemasonic Bugnini, six protestants, removal of almost 80 % of prayers, abuses and faulty translations.
      In Poland it is used "for many" regarding spilling the Blood of Christ, maybe that's why there were miracles with Eucharist. In Croatia all NO priests and bishops say "for all" in consecration of wine to become Blood of Christ. That's trubling my mind, I have a doubt that this invalides the consecration and therefore all mass. What are your thoughts on that? When the reverend NO priest is also to far away to go every sunday, do we go to liberal parish with altar girls, nuns receiving (sometimes giving) the Holy Communion in the hand. So many bishops around the world asked from governement even more strict "measures" agains Covid-19. Most of them didn't need to be pressured, they are traitors of Christ and wolves in sheep's clothing.
      God bless you and your outstanding work.

      Delete
  50. I don't understand this statement: Emmerich was beatified on 3 October 2004, by Pope John Paul II. However, the Vatican focused on her own personal piety rather than the religious writings associated to her by Clemens Brentano. Her documents of postulation towards canonisation are handled by the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I mean how is the PriestlyFraternity involved???

      Delete
    2. I didn't know that Fraternity had her papers, but, they would not be included anyway, as she did not personally write them. Usually, a saint has to have their own writings included in a canonization process, especially as in this case there is some evidence Brentano added to her texts, so this is why they avoid texts written by others in the process. A saint has to have written something themselves for it to be included for the examination. So yes, the Church can decide to examine only the personal piety of a candidate if they wish in this circumstance. The same will possibly happen with Marie-Julie Jahenny as she did not write the texts of her prophecies. Only her own piety and accounts of the miracles that happened to her will probably be considered.

      Delete
  51. https://templates.office.com/en-us/history-and-milestone-timeline-tm67302905

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A timeline template in case you might be able to use it... also, wow, what a great work you are doing here. Thank you and Godspeed. +JMJ+

      Delete
  52. A question on Bl. Anna Maria Taigi (1769-1837): although not a church approved event, as far as I know, Garabandal does mention a "Warning" that has been described by Conchita as an interior notion of our faults as seen by God to be experienced by everyone followed by a "miracle" within the same year. Could this Warning be the "illumination of consciousness"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi. Thing is, while we will have any 'warnings' leadiing up to the chastisements, there is no credible evidence Bl. Anna Maria Taigi made a prediction of an 'illumination of consciences' event, apparently, that prophecy has been tacked onto her name only in recent years similar to what has happened to St. Padre Pio regarding the 3 Days of Darkness - he himself insisted he never made such a prophecy and people were fraudulently attaching such a prophecy to his name.

      If a vision claims that a 'universal revelation' is going to reveal all our faults to ourselves as God sees them before the chastisements, yes, this is referring to the 'illumination of consciences'. Personally, I find this one 'prophecy' problematic as Ven. Maria Clausi seems to indicate that fake mystics will try to predict something like this and to stay away from them, and he appears to be correct, so far every 'vision' or 'mystic' that I've come across that has predicted this 'illumination of consciences' is either unapproved by the Church, condemned, or even heretical! In fact, the first mention of an 'illumination of consciences' prophecy was put out in apparently fraudulent manner as there is no evidence whatsoever that the mystic it is attributed to even existed but was possibly fabricated, and, this happened right at the time Ven. Clausi gave his warning. I've seen people twist real texts and prophecies out of context to try and show this 'prophecy' to be true, when so far it's not proven credible.

      More info here:
      https://greatmonarch-angelicpontiffprophecies.blogspot.com/p/illumination-of-conscience-event.html

      Delete
  53. Hello, regarding Garabandal apparition that I truly believed. It has many evidence of Padre Pio support in apparition like telling and inviting people to visit Garabandal like Joachim Bouflet, PH.D., Joey Lomangino and many more. Why you are still skeptical in this apparition. I read what you wrote regarding Garabandal in suspension page and I dont believe what you wrote and there is still error in your writing regarding and I have counter defense about it. Example the Sacramental, you said Our Lady has no power over blessing in objects or Sacramental, but remember in Mt Gargano a basilica that never consecrated by the hand of a Bishop because it is now consecrated by St Michael himself and not necessary to do so. St Michael is not a priest or human neither but consecrated and blessed it by himself and never question by Church and many saints have visited that place also. And now the Queen of Heaven and earth, the Mother of God and Queen of Miracle and Prodigies are no power over the blessing in Sacramental? Of course it needed Seraphim to explain to us all the great mystery of Mary and her Authority.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You wrote that their is no strong evidence of Padre Pio writing to the girls, but then why Padre Pio reply to the girls invitation to go to Garabandal? He wrote "do you think I can go up the chimney?"  🤔

      Other points:
      When Conchita found out Padre Pio died in Sept. 1968, she met his close friend, Father Bernardino Cennamo, at Lourdes, and asked him, "How is it that Our Lady told me Padre Pio would see the Miracle and he has died?" Father Cenammo responded, "Padre Pio saw the Miracle before he died. He told me himself." The priest gave Conchita one of the three veils that covered Padre Pio's face during his wake, saying that the stigmatist had requested this before he died. He told her truthfully that he personally did not believe in the authenticity of Garabandal until Padre Pio requested this of him. Conchita also was given Padre Pio's rosary, and one of the gloves he wore, stained by his stigmata. She has these treasures preserved at her home in New York.

      As Padre Pio prophesied: "They do not believe in you or in your conversations with the Lady in White. BUT THEY WILL BELIEVE YOU WHEN IT WILL BE TOO LATE"

      Delete
    2. Let's all wait that this prophecy will be fulfilled:

      Conchita: "The pope will go to Russia, to Moscow. As soon as he returns to the Vatican, hostilities will break out in different parts of Europe."

      This will clear all the doubt of people about Garabandal apparition.

      Still the author.

      Delete
    3. Hi. It is believed St. Pio also believed in the Haroldsbach apparitions, (sp?) but when the bishop ruled against it and ordered pilgrimages to stop, St. Pio replied 'Obey your bishop.' Also, the amount of pious of holy people personally believing in something as serious as an apparition is STILL NOT FORMAL APPROVAL UNTIL THE CHURCH ITSELF GIVES FORMAL APPROVAL or even a tacit approval. A good example of something similar is a nun who was thought to have visions and loads of miracles, she had fooled so many people, loads of priests and the bishops, I think she nearly fooled the pope until she finally confessed she had made a pact with the devil in order to have these so-called miracles, so we have to be very very careful in these times. Right now Garabandal is not approved, it is only 'non-constant', meaning not enough proof it is from Heaven, and considering all the strange occurrences there, and they still 'have no proof', it means they were possibly suspecting something else, preternatural, meaning not from Heaving but from 'downstairs' if you get my meaning, but then again, not enough to rule on anything. It is already suspect in that the seers seriously contradicted themselves and even one denied it ever happened, enough for an apparition normally to be condemned outright as this is one of the main things a bishop looks for -- that a seer or seers do not contradict or deny anything no matter how hard and often they are questioned. And Heaven usually does not work against Church procedure for an apparition to be approved. Garabandal failed that. There is also a failed prophecy at Garbandal, a sign of a fake. Marie-Julie Jahenny warned so many false apparitions would be sent out near the time of the chastisements it would be like a swarm of flies choking out the messages of the true apparitions, and, make many people fall into their web as Satan would be extra cunning with his words and actions to make it look like it is from Heaven. They would be difficult to tell apart from the real ones, and for now, I'm afraid this is one of them. Also, about a blessing and a consecration. The Church even says they are two different things: and the blessing of an angel and even the Mother of God gives is NOT that same as priest who blesses in Persona Christi, in the place of Christ. A layperson can even give blessings, but it's not the same as those given by a priest in certain instances, certain holy objects need a priest's blessing before use. It's like absolution, only a priest can give it, even the Mother of God cannot absolve anyone from sin. The suspicious thing about Garabandal is Our Lady supposedly asking for things NOT to be blessed by a priest, only herself. This means people couldn't give the rosaries they already had in order to get an extra blessing on them? Very unlike Fatima, the children would lay out peoples rosaries before the apparition, Our Lady didn't mind! She could very well have put her motherly blessing on a blessed rosary after a priest places the blessing on it with his consecrated hands, she herself was obedient to her Son's priests, the thing is why would an apparition not want a blessed thing come close to her? A devil usually acts that way, not a good sign. Marie-Julie Jahenny is another good example, she could tell objects that were specially chosen by the saints for a purpose, but would not even react to an object like a holy card or picture during an ecstasy if not blessed by a priest. So, there is a distinction. . One might say we have a duty to be suspicious of an apparition if it shows some things that are 'off', that is until approved by the Church. Garabandal has too many suspicious things for now in my personal view to be considered for the 'credible' section of this blog. Again, you may believe if you wish, but I am also free not to believe in Garabandal, and, we are not even required to believe in true apparitions. So, until approved, Garabandal will remain in the 'suspect' section here.

      Delete
    4. No you are wrong regarding Our Lady's blessing in Sacramental. Mary didn't the command the visionaries not to choose objects that are blessed by a priest, in order receive another blessing but a special benediction to this objects, as Mary said to them his Son will work many miracles and prodigies through them, like Our Lady promise to Marie-Julie's lilies! Mary didn't mind the objects what is blessed or not, example of objects and Sacramental kissed by Our Lady are wedding rings(of course it was already blessed by priest on wedding day, she only kissed the rings when the couple are living in good life not in adulterous, or sinful marriage), rosaries of priest and seminarians (ex. Rosary of Fr. Valintino, that was kissed by Mary, of course this priest know the worth of blessing of a priest compared to the objects are not blessed), Mary kissed scapular habits of a religious (you should know all the habits before being wear by new professed religious it was blessed by a Bishop or priest, according to you Mary didn't blessed objects/things blessed by a priest then how dare Mary blessed this religious habit?), Mary kissed Crucifix, Miraculous Medal, Benedictine medal, other religious medal, holy card, Bible, Missal, religious images, etc... Mary kissed it with or without being blessed my a priest. Majority of this objects were blessed by a priest. Other extraordinary events happen in Garabandal when kissing object is Our Lady kissed a woman's cosmetic powder case. Never question our Blessed Mother's intentions, even if we don’t understand it right away.
      One day Conchita was in the kitchen of her house surrounded by persons who were waiting for the moment of the apparition. On the simple table that served for the family meals, the objects that she was going to give to be kissed were being gathered. Together with these, someone had put there a stylish woman's powder case. The child and those present wanted this removed. How could the Virgin come to kiss an object so profane and used only for the service of vanity? Nevertheless, the powder case remained there.

      The ecstasy began and those present saw with astonishment that the visionary's hand, without her looking at it, before going to any other object, went first of all toward the previously discussed powder case. The child raised it toward the invisible Virgin and then set it down with great respect on the table. Among those present, surprise must have been mingled with doubt. Was it really the Virgin who was appearing? It didn't seem that she would kiss such an object...
      As soon as the ecstasy was finished, Conchita was asked for an explanation. And she declared that the Virgin had asked immediately for the powder case in order to kiss it, saying that it was “something belonging to her Son”. The girl did not know anything more. But the person who had put the powder case there did know more and revealed the secret. During the terrible Spanish civil war (1936-1939) in the Red Zone when priests were being executed and had to be hidden, the powder case had been used to bring Communion Hosts to various locations and especially to prisoners whom the Reds held captive in order to execute. Thus it had served as a Pyx. Amazing right? Obviously before this powder case was used as a pyx it was blessed and or even more it was exorcize it.

      Delete
    5. CONTINUATION

      Other point is not all 4 seers contradict each other or the apparition, only Mari Cruz, BVM said it was work of the devil but Mari Cruz will affirm the authenticity of the apparition after she experience the Warning and Miracle.

      The seers is very obedient to the chuch especially in Holy See's decision. Garabandal didn't failed in that. BVM always stress to the seer always be obedient to the priest and Bishop. Conchita also didn't deny anything no matter how hard the persecution and hardship the commission gave it to her, even they abused her by cutting her hair and trying to hypnotize her and many more. And they pursued and force  the girl to sign the blank paper later they write it that the apparition was fake. The Commissions disgrace the apparition you must know that despite of that, the seers is still obedient to the diocese and say nothing bad about them. But accept the suffering and humiliation caused by them as BVM said to her.

      The popes believe in Garabandal especially Pope Sts Paul, JPII, and Card Ratzinger future B XVI, who wants the diocese of Santander to become a neutral.
      Conchita also said that Our Lady had told her that one of the Popes would have a very short reign regarding in the 4 popes before the end of times would come. (which turned out to be Pope John Paul I only 33 days! ) It is true!

      The failed prophecy is only about Joey Lomangino eyes, (it is conditional if you know all of that) it didn't mean Garabandal is fake. I know Saints also that made prophecies, if one or 5 prophecies they made failed to fulfill, so it did it mean they are NOT true Saints? of course not!!!

      The prophecies that are now soon to happen is the pope will come to Moscow after he comeback in Vatican hostilities will break out in many parts of Europe. Let hope for the fulfillment of that prophecy to clear out the minds of many people regarding Garabandal. Also the comeback of Communists.

      I respect your decision and its not part of the deposit of faith. Everyone has freedom to accept or reject it. But Garabandal has a crucial part of understanding eschatology and Marie-Julie prophecies. Thanks EA well appreciated your response.

      Suggestions: read magazines/books about Garabandal, it was free in online.

      Delete
  54. I have a question regarding the Angelic Pontiff's nationality and race, is he is a Roman/ Italian or French origin according in Marie-Julie and legit mystics? Thank you 😊

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Bl. Catherine Emmerick seems to suggest that the 'holy pope' (Angelic Pontiff?) will be an Italian, not from Rome, but close to it. The Secret of La Salette, (the original one sent to the pope Pius IX), also says he won't be from Rome, and will be someone no one expects. Bl. Bartholomew Cambi de Saluzzo, if he proves correct, says the pope will be from the Franciscan order.

      Delete
  55. Thank you for reply EA. But how about Marie-Julie regarding the nationality of this pontiff? I don't know where I read it in your blog, that seems the Angelic Pontiff is French and related to Great Monach. Correct me if I interpreted it wrongly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From all the texts I've read so far, Marie-Julie doesn't mention his nationality, only that of the King, and I haven't found any mention of them being related. No, I don't think it was from my blog, I don't remember ever writing about the Angelic Pontiff being French. I definitely would have put that detail in the timeline if a credible prophecy mentioned that.

      Delete
  56. Hello, does Marie-Julie mention about Pius XII? Ven. Pius XII is a very good friend of mystics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi. Well, I haven't found anything yet with her specifically mentioning him. Something might turn up. Not everything she said has been made public. The 'Friends of Marie-Julie Association' for instance are still trying to decipher many of the texts as some of the scribes used a peculiar shorthand that they can't quite read! So, we'll see what happens.

      Delete
  57. Is their any prophecies or mystics mention about WW3 or the use of nuclear weapons? Thank you so much, well appreciated your good works.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, from the prophecies that are credible or approved that I've gone through, I haven't literally seen anything that specifically says the word 'nuclear', although they do hint at the never-before-seen nature of the weapons and inventions of the diabolical century that the world has never seen before, and since nuclear weapons have only been recently been discovered, it's left to our personal deductions. Ven. Bartholomew Holzhauser gives one description of a type of weapon that will be used, and it seems more like lasers than a nuclear bomb. He described 'swords of light' that can split the air. Alois Irlmaier mentioned bombs, and a 'black box' that will be dropped in the sea near England and cause horrific tidal waves, also, a description of what sounds like atrocious chemical or biological warfare. So, 'nuclear' is certainly in the realm of possibilities here.

      Delete
  58. Your love and devotion for the Great Monarch is apparent, but it seems the entirety of your beliefs about him come from Marie Julie Jahenny's alleged belief that it was the Count of Chambord, and that he is coming back to life. This may be true, or it may not be, I don't know, but I wouldn't go cherry picking everything just to fit your bias. Everyone is in a different place in regards to their knowledge and belief about the eschatological King. Not everything in the mystical realm exactly translates perfectly in this realm. Joan of Arc was condemned and exonerated centuries later, just as were the Templars. Saints have been wrong about things, and even Jonah was upset when his prophecy of destruction did not come to pass, because the people repented. I am not attacking your beliefs, so there is no need to defend what you believe, but its okay to be wrong about things, if it turns out that it is not the Count of Chambourd, it doesn't mean that your love or devotion is any less in regard to the Great Monarch. It seems you have more to gain from being wrong than you do from being right. There is a certain Garabandalist who refuses to accept any other perception of those apparitions other than that which they believe to be true. If it turns out they are wrong, it doesn't mean their love of those Apparitions is less, just that God has something more for them. The same is true for you. If you are right, you have nothing to gain, but if you are wrong, God has something more for you. God Bless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, you are entitled to your viewpoints, and I can only inform, not convince. I must say, however, contrary to what you think, I have not simply 'cherry picked' to suit my personal beliefs. I too thought the Count as King was a a strange and almost impossible point until it is apparent it fits will all the credible prophecies and their details. Please note Marie-Julie Jahenny simply did not 'believe' it was the Count of Chambord: the words of her visions, aka Our Lady, and St. Michael themselves point him out, and Marie-Julie was not the only mystic to do so. Ven. Mother Bourg specifically named him as well, and the Count was also confirmed by the 'mystic of Tours' and that he would one day be king and finally accepted by France. (I haven't discovered much about this mystic yet, but hopefully will look into the Tours mystic), so we have possibly three accounts, and Christ said you only need two witnesses for Him to be present.
      Remember, if the prophecies come from true mystics, then their prophecies must come to pass as God is not a liar and He will not fail to fulfil what He has foretold will happen, He promised Marie-Julie it would happen, and, said it displeased Him greatly if we doubted His promise. Why, because as said, we would be calling God a liar and shows a lack of trust in Him and His power.
      God's promise to Jonah did indeed come true, not just when Jonah thought it would. Marie-Julie did know however, the king pointed out to her would return after her own death in another future epoch. Resurrection is pointed out several times in her ecstasies. Prophecies from other saints and mystics point out the king would come in the 19th century, others note sometime the 20th/ 21st century. Thanks to Marie-Julie's visions, we know the Count was named, and, is the only one who fits this double-timeframe, plus his identity is confirmed by Ven. Bourg . And, he fulfils all the other major details regarding the last king of France from the direct legitimate as well. Until another approved or credible mystic proves otherwise, the Count is still the most likely candidate that fits all the details given. You have to take into account all the credible details from all the other mystics, or then there really would be cherry-picking. God bless.

      Delete
    2. Well you certainly could be right. Anything is possible. Could be the Miracle of Garabandal is the return of the Count of Chambourd.

      Delete
  59. Your Q and A section talks about Benedict being the Pope "pushed aside" and how there can't be a broken line of Peter. With Benedicts passing wouldnt that mean Francis is the true pope and not an antipope?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello. Yes, this is an interesting situation to try and navigate. The prophecies point to the real pope being shoved aside, (some point to him dying when shoved aside, or in a type of exile, or actual exile,) the hints all point to Pope Benedict being the real pope shoved aside at the time.

      Now, yes, according to the way succession works with this odd way things turned out - Pope Francis would be acting 'legit' pope, so we tentatively accept that for now - Marie-Julie mentioned we would still have a succession of a couple of popes, I think about three, maybe even four, if I remember properly, before the real chastisements break out in Italy, and the holiest pope at the end of them, i.e. Angelic Pontiff will be the one to restore it. It's hard to see where her line comes in, she even mentioned an anti-pope would be in the middle of this, maybe even two! But, it *could* be Pope Benedict, was the first,Pope Francis is the second and will live to see the chastisements come in, (we could have another pope after him) then holiest pope comes and will be the Angelic Pope who will restore all, and we will look for him amidst the rubble, Marie-Julie said (Rome will be nearly destroyed during the chastisements.)

      So, odd as this sounds, we have to follow Pope Francis as the 'legit' successor for now with the caveat he may continue to come out with some surprising stuff that is actually error as he has been doing - it is not beyond the realm of possibility the Angelic Pope in the future could look at his pontificate, declare him an anti-pope, and annul everything he set in motion. It has happened in the past. So we have to accept for the present time he is 'acting pope', we can only follow what he says is true to Catholic teaching and tradition, we can ignore and not follow anything else that is not Catholic, and wait to see exactly how the future Angelic Pontiff will restore the Church and see what exactly he will annul.

      Delete
  60. Hello, EA Bucchianeri does Marie-Julie ever mention Don Bosco in her prophecies or vision? Thanks in advance. Happy Easter

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi - Happy Easter to you too! She does not mention him by name, but, there is a cryptic prophecy that seems to refer to him, a 'messenger of the earth with commands from the Lord', would visit the 'prince of the earth' who loved the white colour, i.e the true King of France, Henry V the Count of Chambord, before his death. The 'special messenger' had to be St. Don Bosco as he actually made a special visit and prepared the Count for death. You can read the prophecy here (Post #140 on the Marie-Julie Jahenny blog):

      https://marie-juliejahenny.blogspot.com/2019/01/140-prophecies-special-messenger-of-god.html

      Delete
  61. Peace will come when a descendant of King Charles VII ascends the throne of France.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I think in regards to the phenomenon of Garabandal. There is most likely a natural explanation. It is quite possible the water supply was tainted with animal feces that was growing psychedelic fungi. In the 1960’s Garabandal was a tiny impoverished devout Catholic hamlet that survived solely off livestock. Being in a mountainous terrain more than likely the watershed for a few years tainted the water supply. Psychedelic trips took on a religious character because of the rural Catholic upbringing which led to a religious frenzy ensuing.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Cool Blog.

    Was wondering a personal question that you don’t need to answer.

    What does your prayer life look like in regards to the Great Monarch. How often do you pray for him and what devotions?

    Warm regards

    ReplyDelete
  64. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Dear EA, just writing to check if you are OK? Normally you reply to questions very quickly, but it's been weeks... praying for your health, safety and well-being. Christ's peace, John

    ReplyDelete
  66. Dear E A . I also am concerned about you. You haven’t replied in quite some time. Love and support.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Hello Ms. Bucchianeri. Would you please take a look at this very well documented, peer-reviewed study from Professor Francis Gumerlock?

    https://francisgumerlock.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/Millennialism%20and%20the%20Early%20Church%20Councils.%20Gumerlock.pdf

    In that paper, he clearly demonstrates that the claim that a literal Millennium was never declared as "heretical" by any Ecumenical Council, as you claim. In fact, the Catholic Church has never infallibly ruled on that issue. If after reading, you agree with the evidence he provides, please update the following page on your site:

    https://greatmonarch-angelicpontiffprophecies.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_32.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello, thank you for the information - I have updated the page accordingly. However, the Church has indeed declared its teaching on the issue - 1) It recognises literal chilianism as coming from gnostic (heretical) teachings as .... 2) great theologians such as Origen of Alexandria, St. Jerome and St. Augustine finally succeeded in showing the error of this interpretation of the Bible 3) the Church as a result recognizes the number as symbolic not literal, this teaching was even included in the Douay-Rheims Bible. 4) Therefore, to say Christ will come back personally 'early' to rule before the Last Day for 1,000 years goes against authentic Church teaching - 5) it was the Protestant sects such as the heretical Anabaptists who brought back the literal interpretation of the 1,000 years, so, it is definitely a serious doctrinal error concerning the Church's teachings on the Last Day and Last Judgement to promote a literal interpretation of the 1,000 years.

      Delete
  68. Hi everyone - thanks for the concern--it's just that I am incredibly busy at the moment! Online life has to take a backseat at times!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, this is me answering - the blog wouldn't let me sign in at first....glitches!

      Delete
  69. What are your thoughts on Padre Pio believing in the Garabandal mystic?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. His example is what we should follow, his personal belief does not equal Church authority. He believed in the Haroldsbach apparitions of Germany, but the Church officially ruled against them. When people complained to him about this, he immediately declared. "Obey your bishops". They are the ones who have the discernment and authority to rule on an apparition. So far, the negative ruling of 'Non constat' on Garabandal was recently confirmed again by the local bishop. We are required to be obedient to official rulings.

      Delete
  70. Have you ever considered the possibility that authentic mystics can contradict each other and still be authentic mystics?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It depends on the type of contradictions. Sometimes, some mystics are shown different things – for instance, Our Lord showed Himself to Pere Lamy in a crucifixion scene that didn't represent exactly how He was crucified on earth, and some others witnessed it – he was puzzled as to why Our Lord showed Himself crucified on a different type of cross and in a slightly different pose (than he was used to seeing), but it was still a true vision. So, this type of 'contradiction' doesn't mean the mystic or the visions is fake. Our Lord has his reason for showing different 'details' or symbolism. Certain mystics don't not see every little detail the same.

      On the other hand, a contradiction that points out a fake is when it goes against theological / natural law, etc, or is a blatantly obvious contradiction against reason, etc. Or, contradicts church teaching, etc. For one example, Bl Emmerick was shown in her Biblical visions a man had terrible temptations against purity, and, Our Lord instructed him to stop eating garlic to get the temptations under control. It is known by herbalists that garlic increases circulation, and is used as a natural remedy to increase libido in men. Now compare that with 'Luz de Maria's remedies that tell we must 'heal the body to save our souls”, (which is a ludicrous teaching, it is being in a state of sin and not bad health that damns us,) and then she gives a remedy which requires garlic. She also has a heresy in her visions which indicate a 'Third Coming' of Christ by saying there is going to be an 'intermediate coming' (when the Church teaches there is only going to be a Second Coming), so, we can see blatantly obvious contradictions here that show Luz de Maria cannot be authentic.

      Another glaring contradiction is seen in Francine Bériault who says the Three Days of darkness, will not be three days but one by saying time itself will move at “three times the normal pace”. Which means the three days would literally be one day, which is 1) illogical an contradicts the natural law of time and the rotation of the earth, etc. 2) contradicts other true mystics that the Days will indeed by Three, they will last a Thursday, Friday, and Saturday,- 3) Time will not even appear to go fast as we know it will be a time of terror which will be felt by all, and time slows down in our perception when we are in terror, it certainly won't 'speed up'. Pain and fear makes time seem slow, even the souls in Purgatory say so – it makes their sentences feel much longer than they actually are.

      These are the types of contradictions to watch out for, etc.

      Delete
  71. You too have a Question. I will answer it for you. You are the Dogma of Faith. It remains intact.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. However, you should at least consider Medjugurje as authentic, because it is a tobacco farming village, and smoking was considered a privelage for Kings.

      Delete
  72. I’m so deeply afraid of the period the Antichrist. what can we possibly do to get right with God in the way He wants?

    ReplyDelete
  73. The instructions can be found in the Gospel of John, chapter 14. Basically, you need to keep the 10 Commandments and follow precisely what the Roman Catholic Church teaches. How do you do that? Get a traditional Catholic Catechism, like the Catechism of Pius X or the Catechism of Trent. Start attending a traditional Catholic chapel where the TLM is offered. Ask the priest for guidance. And, most importantly, start praying the Rosary every day. Try to work up to 15 decades per day, if possible.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Is the Novus Ordo licit?

    ReplyDelete
  75. Hi - well, Eucharistic miracles are still happening with the NO Mass: this cannot happen with anything invalid in my humble lay person's opinion.

    Do I think it is the 'best' Mass that gives all honour to God? Hmmm, I personally see it is full of Protestant elements - it is word for word exactly the same service given by the Protestants in Westminster Abbey in London! And why are we copying heretics that have left the Church? Imitation is the highest form of flattery as the say... if we are Catholics, just why are we doing this?

    Also, so many abuses happen now at the New Mass, that it is becoming a danger to attend as if you just 'get used to it', I've seen so many Communions dropped on the floor with no act of reparation made, priests switching things or leaving things completely out and adding elements of their own to the rite that are NOT licit at all and actually invalidate the whole thing: you never know if you could be in complicit to the abuses. So, I attend a Latin Mass, and only out of dire necessity if I can't get to a Latin Mass, I will go to the most reverential NO Mass possible that is said according to the rubrics, just to fulfill the Mass obligation for Sundays and holy days.

    Remember, the real danger we are facing is the false rite that will be enforced by Socialist / Communist states with a 'bread and water' service as foretold by Marie-Julie Jahenny that will NOT have wine, and therefore will completely lack a valid consecration, it will be ecumenical in nature and can be celebrated 'everywhere' i.e. in all churches she seems to imply. We aren't exactly there ...yet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How far off do you think we are from the socialist/communist that will take over and false services will be offered in most churches?

      Delete
    2. No one can give an exact time for that - the prophecies themselves are loose on time so to give leeway for holding off the chastisements should enough people repent.
      But, 1) Bl. Emmerick saw Satan loosed from Hell 50 or 60 years before the year 2000
      2) Pope Leo XIII saw Satan would be given 100 years of time to his worst, but his time might be cut short,
      3) St. John Bosco saw the Peace and restoration come with a blue moon in May, (which give us the years 2026 or 2045) - the peace coming near 2045 looking more likely as -
      4) Marie Julie Jahenny noted the wars of the chastisements in France would last 3 and a half to 4 and a half years before the next war in Rome, so perhaps give or take a maybe 6 or 7 years of total civil wars before the peace. (???) We haven't had the civil wars yet which has me leaning closer to the 2045 date for the peace arriving .... perhaps it might come sooner if God decides to send the chastisements sooner - we've just had a recent warning from Akita the punishments cannot now be avoided, they are coming 'soon'.

      ....which all suggests at least that an escalation towards this 'Red Sate' persecution is going to come 'soon', we can expect things to start ramping up in earnest possibly the next decade to prepare for it. Another sign according to Marie-Julie would be the bevy of tyrannical laws that would be passed in France that cannot be overturned, reformed, or overruled, too many of them, man's government would be so corrupt and it will take the chastisements to wipe out the government to start all afresh again under God's rule. We have an inkling of this happening with a recent law just passed in France: any criticism of the mRNA platform is now punishable with up to 3 years imprisonment and 45,000 euros.

      “Article 4 is central to the new law, which was first deleted but then reinstated. This creates a new criminal offense and criminalizes the “ request to stop or refrain from therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment” as well as “the request to use practices that are presented as therapeutic or prophylactic ”. This means that any resistance to mRNA treatment (and other corporate medical methods) can be criminalized in the future.” So, you can get punished for resisting treatments that could change your DNA with regards to vaccines, basically. Guess which latest plague brought all this in? The Plandemic.

      So, that's what I see basically - expect things to steadily ramp up.

      Delete
  76. Hi Ms Bucchianeri, I arrived at your website seeking information about the 5 secret prophecies of St Bernadette which are being promoted by a highly regarded author in his fairly recent book about apparitions and prophecies surrounding Our Lady. I had already dug up some information pointing to the fact that they are fake, and your well researched information clinched the matter. Now I would like to ask you about another matter. Do you know about the Divine Will devotion, and if so, what are your thoughts about it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi - do you mean the 'Divine Will' revelations by Luisa Piccareta? Well, the first introduction I had of her personally told me something was 'off'. The booklet I was given about her said Our Lady 'revealed' to Luisia that she once almost thought she was equal with God - and we know for certain Our Lady could never have had the bare iota of a notion of thinking that! She couldn't even commit a fault, therefore, could not entertain it has a temptation. So, that was an immediate red flag with me and I didn't bother to check into anything more about her after that. Now, some people have said 'well, maybe you got a bad English translation?'- No, you cannot mess up an easy phrase like that. Perhaps, it could have been an unauthorized edition in English, some people have suggested too, but someone else told me, no official English editions were permitted yet, so they are all 'unofficial translations' if that is the case. Major confusion about all of this: so is there any way to know if we can even study official texts? Also, priests have told me that her visions promote the heresy of 'quietism'.

      Now, it has been announced in "La Croix" in France, (February 3, 2024) that this January (2024) the Dicastry for the Causes of Saints have sent notification to Bishop Benoît Bertrand of Mende, president of the French bishops' Episcopal Doctrinal Commission, who in turn has notified the French bishops, that her beatification process has been suspended. Apparently, there are doctrinal errors ""theological, Christological, and anthropological" in nature.

      That is pretty serious, and definitely suggests something has indeed been 'off'. I'm sorry I can't give the whole article, it is behind a paywall, but you can see it in the URL below (Copy and paste it to your browser).


      https://international.la-croix.com/news/religion/beatification-process-of-luisa-piccarreta-suspended/19116

      Delete
    2. PS - I got a bit further behind the paywall and got some more info - this is serious enough for me to put up a page "pronto" about the 'Divine Will' considering how many are being led astray by this - her writings were never approved, her beatification process was refused the 'nihil obstat' twice due to the errors in her writings, and now, as you see, her beatification process that did manage to start is halted once again due to the doctrinal errors in her writings. You can visit my page here:

      https://greatmonarch-angelicpontiffprophecies.blogspot.com/p/luisa-piccarretta-and-divine-will-1865.html

      Delete
    3. Thank you, Ms Bucchanieri. Yes, it is about Luisa Piccarreta. Very good to hear that her beatification process has been suspended. She has an enormous number of followers, and they are aggressive in promoting her, something that I have experienced personally. Two of her main promoters globally are Fr Iannuzzi and Daniel O'Connor. They organise studies about Luisa and the DW, and have many videos on YT.

      Fr Iannuzzi has many academic qualifications and constantly reminds his followers about them in order to bolster his position as an expert and prevent any opposition to his views. What is interesting is that he believes in ETs, claims the Church wants us to believe in them, and that at both Medjugorje and Garabandal Our Lady said that ETs exist.

      Daniel O'Connor similarly regards himself as an expert and brooks no opposition. He has a recent video about the suspension of Luisa's cause where he calls one of the high clerics a wolf in sheep's clothing.

      He also has a video castigating Fr Mawdsley, who recently, while talking on another topic, spoke out against Luisa's writing, quoting a certain horrible passage. This led to a fire storm in the comments and to many people turning on Fr M.

      Thank you once again. May God bless you and Our Lady protect!

      Delete
    4. Sadly, Marie-Julie Jahenny predicted this: near the times of the chastisements a host of fake mystics would infect the world like a swarm of flies out of hell that will be so cunning, so close to looking and sounding like real visions, complete with fake miracles and signs, that they will fool many people, even good priests and faithful. Even those poor mystics themselves who are not outright fakes like a scammer are going to be fooled by fake visions into selling the souls, etc. And, when other people actually do see the errors in the false mystics, and point them out, even with the doctrine of the Church, they will be attacked for not believing these 'mystics', and will cause severe disunity among the faithful. We are not even required to believe in real apparitions, so, to see this kind of frenzy attacking other Catholics is definitely coming from an evil source.

      This is why I stress on this site when looking into mystics 1) obedience to adhering to true Traditional doctrine, / Council of Trent, etc, Ven. Holzhauser said this would be our security and true path in these times, and, 2) that we obey Church rulings on visions - the Church has the final word, and a negative ruling should be adhered to for the sake of peace and unity among the faithful. Satan gets a hoof-hold in when we refuse to obey a ruling and thus cause disunity.

      I've recently seen a video by a priest showing some of the grotesque passages in the diary of Piccarreta: I don't know if this is the priest you are referring to who all the supporters are now attacking for his comments against her diary, but, I agree with the priest - her diary is very disturbing. I had not heard these details before. All I needed to hear is how her books have constantly been officially condemned. How anyone can think her 'mysticism' is real with those passages in her diary, I just don't know. I've added a link to the video on the page I put up on Luisa Piccarreta.

      Delete
    5. How can we be careful by fake visions if we are trying to advance in the spiritual life? How can we protect ourselves from them? If Satan is so good at being an Angel of light, what can we possibly do?

      Delete
  77. In 1880 Fr. M.J. O'Brien published a book in which he proved that St. Malachy was not the author of the Prophecy of the Popes. The true author seems to have been Fr. arnold Wion who used the St. Malachy attribution to avoid attention from the Roman Inquisition for the publication of an illegal Judgement Day prophecy. That fact does not necessarily invalidate Wion's 39 post 1590 papal predictions which must stand or fall on their own merit.
    In 1624 Fr.Messingham re-printed Wion's list of 113 predictions, but conflated the last two leaving just 112. Pope Francis is number 112 on the original list of 113.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Hi, thank you for the info - I will take a closer look at this as soon as I can - will amend the St. Malachy page as soon as I can study this.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Thanks for noticing my post. Fr. O'Brien's book is an important source, but he made three errors: 1. He used Messingham's conflated version of 112. 2. He translated the Latin word "sedebit" as "there will sit." (That phrase does not exist in Latin.) 3. He speculated, based on his spurious rendering of "sedebit," that there could be intervening popes before the advent of Petrus Romanus. The correct numbering and translation of the 113 papal predictions falsifies that idea.
    Prediction number 112 applying to Pope Francis is:
    "In psecutione.extrema S.R.E sedebit."
    "He will reign in the final persecution. of the Holy Roman Church."
    The validity of Wion's predictions stands or falls on the fulfillment of number 112. We ought to hope that it fails. A persecution is not to be desired.

    ReplyDelete
  80. I saw this recently thought you might find it interesting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OewOC50DzA

    Its from the National Divine Mercy shrine on Garabandal

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Too many red flags for me to believe in Garabandal until the Church declares otherwise:
      https://greatmonarch-angelicpontiffprophecies.blogspot.com/p/apparitions-of-garabandal-1961-1965.html

      Delete
  81. Knowing that the western schism was the end times only prevented by the western schism, I oddly found this new advent prophecy that was seemingly rejected when none of it came to fruition.
    https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14477c.htm
    It’s read pretty similar to the point I think it could be listed possibly

    Apologies as I couldn’t find your email

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, this prophecy is already mentioned in the "Suspect and Condemned" section:
      https://greatmonarch-angelicpontiffprophecies.blogspot.com/p/bl-theolophre-theolophis-theophilis.html

      Delete
  82. *st Vincent ferrer

    ReplyDelete
  83. When St. Hildegard of Bingen refers to a “ great nation in the ocean that is inhabited by people of different tribes and descent,” could she have been referring to England/the UK? When she says it’s land in the east will be lost “ through a Tiger and a Lion,” could that be talking about India whose national animal is a tiger and coat of arms has lions on it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi - its difficult to know for certain what's meant here. Probably one of the those prophecies that can only be understood when they occur so we know we are in the time. Assuming, these are St. Hildegarde's prophecies at all: I've had to mark these lately as 'attributed' as there does not seem to be any of this wording in her actual written works. I'm still trying to find the original printed source for these particular prophecies to see if she really did make them. (Also, still haven't found enough evidence to mark them 'suspect' either for now.)

      Delete
  84. You seem to be taking a literalist approach to Marie Julie Jahenny. This is exactly what many of the Jews did at the time of Jesus. They believed that Elijah was coming first to prepare the way for the Messiah, and he did come at the Transfiguration with Moses, however it was John the Baptist that came in the spirit of Elijah. Perhaps the Dauphin is amongst you already in the spirit of Henri count of Chambourd, but you don't recognize him because you are waiting for the return of a man long since deceased.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Forgive me for observing, by using the example of the prophecy of Elijah, you contradicted your own argument about being literal.

      The Jews weren’t wrong, only in the timing -- the Church teaches that particular prophecy is still literally going to come to pass with Elijah and Enoch being sent back body and soul to preach on earth in the time of the Antichrist to prepare for the Second Coming of Christ. And, the Servant of God, Don Dolindo Ruotolo believed the prophecy of Enoch and Elijah returning also doubled as a Great Catholic Monarch and Angelic Pontiff prophecy.

      While it’s not my job to convince, I just inform, yet this also means I can’t ignore the information I see before my very eyes.

      I take a literal view with Marie-Julie’s prophecies regarding Henry V as:

      1) Our Lord and Lady used the present tense when saying the predestined king was the one ‘they’ (i.e. the people), call the ‘Miracle Child’. Henry V was alive at the time and indeed called ‘The Miracle Child’ by his supporters due to the circumstances surrounding his birth. She definitely was referring to him.

      2) The Great Monarch prophecies agree the promised king will be a French king, and, the last King of France. Henry V was the last King of France technically for a week before his throne was usurped – and, he was the last direct descendant of the Bourbon Line of France. Of interest, a Great Monarch prophecy states the man coming before the king, who people would think think was the promised one, a ‘father of the nation’ would die of a stab wound – Henry’s father was assassinated by a stab wound. In Marie-Julie’s visions, Heaven mentioned the royal number of the promised king in saying “5” – no other king of the Legitimist line of France can now take that number – even the Orleanist side branch of the legitimate line have had Henrys since, and, they have taken the next number, 6, 7, 8, 9, etc. There literally cannot be another French King that can take the name Henry and assume the number 5 as being the fifth Henry in the lineage, because, they simply are not. Christ literally told Marie-Julie ALL the prophecies refer to ‘The Miracle Child’, and to no other. His name ‘Henry V’ is constantly referred to as well in her visions.

      3) Ven. Mother Josepha of Bourg was also given his other name: ‘Dieudonné’, and that this Prince would be rejected, but God would “return” him. She also saw this when he was alive, and, was shown he would be “returned”, sometime after the exterminating angels carried out justice on earth. Henry V’s middle name is ‘Dieudonné’ – the ‘Gift of God’

      4) Constantly in the prophecies of Marie-Julie was see the ‘lily’ of France being ‘resurrected’ and rising from a tomb – it was an ancient belief the king of nation was tied to the land, and vice versa. The promised king is also described as ‘the lily’ in her prophecies. Henry’s V’s tomb is also cryptically mentioned several times in the prophecies. And, she was literally told the ‘Miracle Child’ will ‘return’ – that He is reserved for the ‘future epoch’.

      5) Other credible Great Monarch prophecies point out two seemingly contradictory dates for his appearance on earth – the 1800s, and / or the 20th / 21st -- (the 20th and / or 21th the century depending on the state of the earth and how long we can hold off the chastisements with penance.) Now if the prophecies are credible, which I think they are, how can they both be right, unless we take into account what Marie-Julie and Ven. Josepha of Bourg was told – Henry V was alive in the 19th century, was taken in death as the first chastisement according to Marie-Julie, but would be returned in a future epoch.


      Delete
    2. 6) When Christ / Heaven gives an exact prophecy like this regarding a particular person and their very name and number, Henry V of France and that he will be returned in a future epoch, He cannot go back of it, or He would have lied. We see God in the Old Testament foretold the arrival of King Cyrus literally by name who would deliver the Jews, and that prophecy was given about 200 years before King Cyrus of Persia came. God cannot lie or give a false promise. A prophecy is a promise in something Our Lord will do. That’s why Our Lord told Peter in the Garden of Gethsemane to stand back, He could send a legion of angels to stop His enemies from taking Him, but this was not to happen, He said the prophecies ‘need be fulfilled’ – I.e. the prophecies of how the Messiah was to suffer and die at the hands of His enemies must be done as foretold or God would have been a liar to His people.

      The Church teaches God is keeping Elijah and Enoch alive for several millennia, they have not yet died, and they are gong to return, but people cannot believe God can raise up a man who is dead only a few centuries when it is indicated in the texts? One of our main articles of belief is the resurrection of the dead! Saints have even raised up the dead in the name of Christ. God told Marie-Julie in the future chastisements, we are going to ‘need all our faith’ – and that can also mean really understanding and fully believing in the resurrection of the dead, because she was cryptically told there would be ‘many resurrections’. Christ also said to Marie-Julie He was going to astound the world with the supernatural wonders as a sign to those reprobates who continually negate and refuse to believe in the supernatural.

      Considering these details, this is why I am a ‘literalist’ when it comes to the Count of Chambord.

      Delete
    3. Fair enough, I'm not saying you are wrong, just keep an open mind, because things don't always play out the way we think.

      Delete
    4. Actually I think you are so wrong about the Great Monarch, and I am going to tell you who I think it is....in the city I live there is a homeless man that doesn't accept anything from anyone. He wears tattered clothes and pushes a cart full of junk. He has a territory and sleeps outside year round. He doesn't drink and doesn't smoke,and doesn't drug. Most people think he is crazy or a blot on society, but I see absolute greatness in him. He makes David goggins look like a pussy cat. This man has a pain and strength that I have never encountered in all my travels. The priest from Italy makes fun of him, as do others, but what I see in him is absolute detachment. So you keep waiting on some dead privileged prince, but as far as I'm concerned if this man isn't the great monarch, he should be. I respect this man. Marie Julie Jahenny would respect this man too.

      Delete
    5. you are in no position to attribute the title of "great monarch" to any random man you have respect for, don't be so arrogant. The creator of this blog has done well to gather, study and interpret these prophecies and even if they are wrong about the exact identity of the great monarch (which is possible and even likely) they are definitely much closer than you are.

      Delete
  85. Sir, in your St. Malachy analysis you labeled the "Petrus Romanus" prediction as "THE LAST NAMED POPE." I do not believe that this attribution is correct for the simple reason that, with the exception of "Petrus Romanus," none of the papal predictions actually gives a proper name to a pope.
    The second issue is that your blog is still stuck on the conflated 1624 numbering of the predictions. (Florilegium Insulae Sanctorum, Messingham, 1624, pgs 376-378.) Wion's original list has 113 paragraphs, and even the erroneous WIKI article acknowledges this fact. (Lignum Vitae, Wion, 1595, pg. 311.)
    Finally we have the incorrect translation of the Latin verb, "sedebit," which cannot be rendered as "there will sit, (reign, preside) because the usage of an imaginary noun did not exist in Latin. The correct translation of sedebit is: "He will sit (reign, preside.)" An online research of the Vulgate Bible for the translations of "sedebit" results in no renederings of that verb as "there will sit."
    Prediction number 112 which applies to Pope Francis is:
    In psecutione.extrema S.R.E. sedebit.
    He will reign in the final persecution.of the Holy Roman Church.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jeff – since we’re getting stuck on words here, I’ve changed ‘named’ to ‘listed’. And changed ‘there will sit’ to ‘he’.

      Also, please hold your horses! I haven’t had time to properly get into a text study to verify and update everything - etc.

      Delete
  86. Maybe you just need to accept that Marie Julie Jahenny was just WRONG about who the Great Monarch was...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll explain to you why he was not Exalted in this life. As the Pope said he fought for a napkin. I agree with him in not accepting the tricolor, but to stand by the ancient regime was a fatal mistake that cost him his crown. Had he just created his own banner for New France, he would have fulfilled prophecy. So there are two possibilities he may be coming back to fix his bloody mistake, or it has passed to another legitimate successor that may or may not follow Salic Law.

      Delete
  87. Do you know if the are any apparitions mentioning Prussians. I know there are parts of the Yves Dupont’s Catholic prophecy book that mention Prussians but do you know if they are mentioned anywhere else?

    ReplyDelete
  88. Do you think that this Maria Julia Jehennys prophecy from Christ is talking about the Novus Ordo or something else? And if it is about the New Mass what does that mean for us?

    "I give you a WARNING. The disciples who are not of My Gospel are now working hard to remake according to their ideas and under the influence of the enemy of souls a MASS that contains words that are ODIOUS in My sight. When the fatal hour arrives when the faith of my priests is put to the test, it will be (these texts) that will be celebrated in this SECOND period ... The FIRST period is (the one) of my priesthood which exists since Me. The SECOND is (the one) of the persecution when the ENEMIES of the Faith and of Holy Religion (will impose their formulas) in the book of the second celebration ... These infamous spirits are those who crucified Me and are awaiting the kingdom of THE NEW MESSIAH."

    ReplyDelete
  89. since your original claim is that "pope" francis is not actually Pope and that "pope" benedict XVI is the real Pope then i guess you must now be a sedevacantist now that benedict XVI is dead. by the way, a heretical Pope automatically ceases to be Pope upon accepting heresy and a heretic cannot be elected Pope, so francis, along with his past few predecessors are not actual Popes.

    ReplyDelete
  90. since your original claim is that "pope" francis is not actually Pope and that "pope" benedict XVI is the real Pope then i guess you must now be a sedevacantist now that benedict XVI is dead. by the way, a heretical Pope automatically ceases to be Pope upon accepting heresy and a heretic cannot be elected Pope, so francis, along with his past few predecessors are not actual Popes.

    ReplyDelete