!? Brother John of the Cleft Rock (b. 1310? – died c. 1366-1370 AD)

BROTHER JOHN OF THE CLEFT ROCK – aka Johannes of Rupescissa, also Jean de Roquetaillade – SUSPECT, HERETICAL, and NOT APPROVED.



Among the prophecies of the Great Monarch and Angelic Pontiff that have circulated we find prophecies by a 'Brother John of the Cleft Rock'.




They have been shared as an 'approved' source, and even I was taken in by his prophecies and included them in the book “We Are Warned: The Prophecies of Marie-Julie Jahenny” as they are prolific on Catholic websites and sound very much like the prophecies by approved mystics, but after wondering who this unknown 'Brother John' could be and  completing some research I discovered they are in fact by a Franciscan monk named Johannes of Rupescissa, also known in French as Jean de Roquetaillade.  'Rupescissa' is a play in Latin for 'torn' or 'ceft' "roche", the Norman-French word for 'rock', while"Roquetaillade" is the French version for the same.  He was born  circa 1310 – died between 1366 and 1370 AD.  

  He is NOT an approved mystic and his texts are indeed DUBIOUS and HERETICAL. The New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia website website says his prophecies are NOT Church approved and declared false:




His false prophecies and violent denunciation of ecclesiastical abuses brought him into disfavour with his superiors, resulting in his imprisonment by Clement VI (1345) and Innocent VI (1356)”.





He was an alchemist who invented distillation. He was interested in the ancient prophecies and wrote prolific commentaries on them, and he believed all could be explained through alchemy, and even believed the Antichrist could be defeated through alchemy! (Source; see Footnote 1)  

However, he did not have visions himself. Therefore, what sounds authentic comes from previously known prophecies, and the commentaries he provides are his own observations, which were heavily influenced by his study of alchemy and his search for the alchemical 'philosopher's stone', hence the symbols of the eagle, leopard and lion garbled into a strange mystic combat that is obviously borrowed from quasi-occult alchemical imagery. In all, it appears his 'prophecy' was an attempt to put his own alchemical stamp on the Great Monarch and Angelic Pontiff prophecies and are not real prophecies granted by Heaven.


Note, he was associated with the 'Spiritual Franciscans' who were condemned later as leaning towards heretical versions of Millanarianism. 

He apparently was also one of the first (2) to uphold literal   Millanarianism / Chiliasm, i.e. the interpretation of a thousand year reign of the Church on earth, which was denounced as heresy. (See more about that heresy, click here.)


He predicted that after the defeat of the Antichrist, those who fought him would be raised up from the dead and reign with Christ literally on earth for 1,000 years before the final battle of Gog and Magog at the end of the world.  Those who died before the Antichrist's arrival would not rise from the dead until after the end of the millenium, aka, the end of the world. (Footnote 3)    


This completely contradicted the teachings of St. Paul regarding the Antichrist and the Second Coming of Christ, (see more here about the Church's traditional teachin on the timing and reign of the Antichrist, click here.) 


Furthermore, in his 'Liber secretorum eventum' Rupescissa predicted that Antichrist would reign for three and one half years before 1370, but that by 1415 a millennium of peace and justice would begin. This would last until 2370 when the arrival of Gog and Magog would herald the End of the World. (4)

As we can see he, was completely wrong and contradicts the timing of the chastisements given to authentic mystics – so, he produced a failed prophecy as well, another sign of a fake.


His 'false prophecies' and obvious leanings towards the heretical Spirituelles in preaching against the hierarchy of the Church and his belief in Millenarianism no doubt had something to do with his imprisionment by two popes, so that is basically non-approval of his prophecies by the Holy See at the time. 

Stangely, he was allowed to write his prophecies while still in prision, even encouraged by a cardinal, but it is obvious this was not formal approval of his works, and, there is also the never-ending problem of clergy encouraging false mystics, either innocently or knowingly.

 Obviously, as Rupescissa's prophecies regarding the end times are heretical, and are described as 'fake' in the Catholic Encyclopedia, they are not recognised by the Church as true prophecies or reliable commentaries on prophecies.





His so-called prophecies on the Great Monarch are further suspect by the fact later editors, especially those in the 16th century, added their own additions, such as trying to fit the prophecies to their times, e.g. the rise of the Protestant heresy, adding Luther's name to the mix, when these predictions were made long before in the 1300s. Johannes Rupescissa could not have known the name 'Luther'. As a result it is difficult to discern which are his commentaries or those added by later editors.



In light of all of this, his Great Monarch prophecies are not included here on this site.

(However, you may appreciate his other alchemical discoveries in distillation in moderation - aqua vitae - basically whisky and spirits!) 

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

 Back to the Great Catholic Monarch and Angelic Pontiff Prophecy Timeline, click here.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Footnotes:

(1) Rupescissa: "Liber lucis", 19rff., in Alyke Zwaantina de Vries, “The General Reformation; divini et humani”, (2020), https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/217422/217422.pdf?sequence=1, p. 34.
(2) Kathryn Kerby Fulton, “The Voice of Honest Indignation: A Study of Refomist Apocalypticism in Relation to Piers Plowman”, Two Volumes, Vol. II, (University of York, Centre for Medieval Studies, 1985), p. 507
(3) Rupescissa, "Liber secretorum eventuum" (1349), 179: “Isti ergo vixerunt corporaliter resuscitati et regnaveruntcorporaliter cum Christo mille annis qui futuri sunt a die mortis Antichristi usque ad adventum Gog et prope finem mundi.”, in Alyke Zwaantina de Vries, “The General Reformation; divini et humani”, (2020), https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/217422/217422.pdf?sequence=1,  pp. 50-51.
(4)  Kathryn Kerby Fulton, “The Voice of Honest Indignation: A Study of Refomist Apocalypticism in Relation to Piers Plowman”, Two Volumes, Vol. II, (University of York, Centre for Medieval Studies, 1985), p. 507