SUSPECT – Contains an
ILLOGICAL / CONTRADICTORY PROPHECY = Fake or hoax mystic
Among the various
'prophecies' that date from the early 1800s in France, there are a
set of prophecies from a 'Nun of Lyelbe', but there are several red
flags showing this is another dubious text that may not have been
from an authentic mystic at all.
(*) Among her
'revelations' is an illogical prediction that contradicts authentic
prophecies and has already proven to be false – meaning, the
following is a fake prophecy:
Our Lord supposedly said
to the 'nun of Lyelbe' He would give the Great Monarch, who will be a
child, a regent who obviously would will rule in his stead for some
time:
"I will give him a
regent who will be a saint, he will follow My ways."
True prophecies have
shown this to be a fake prophecy as the revealed Great Monarch, Henry
V the 'Miracle Child' had a regent for a very short time but who was
certainly not a saint – Louis Philippe I, from the House of
Orleans. He was from the family Heaven had revealed was out of
favour with the Almighty. Louis Philippe was Henry's regent for
only a few days before he usurped the throne from him in the
aftermath of the July Revolution of 1830. Louis Philippe's regime
was anticlerical, and, Heaven revealed to Marie-Julie Jahenny and
Sr. Marie Letaste that he was not the promised king, he was the
choice of sinful men. France had rejected Henry V, the King of
Heaven's choice. Louis Philippe therefore was certainly not a
'saintly regent'!
The error of the Lyelbe
prophecy is more apparent when the authentic prophecies relate the
Great Monarch will indeed by a 'Child of Exile', but he will not rule
his country until he comes with his armies to reclaim France, meaning
he will not be a child when he returns to claim his throne. He will
be in his majority and would not need a regent to rule France.
So, this shows it is a
fake prophecy.
(*) Another Red Flag –
there is no such place as 'Lyelbe' .
Not a town, a village, not
even a convent or building. This is a sure sign something is not
right.
Furthermore, we can see
the letters 'Lyelbe' make up the word 'Belley' which is rather
convenient – we have an indication someone was trying to capitalise
on the 'Prophecies of the Nursing Nun of Belley' – which are also
suspect as those prophecies contain a fake prediction as well, and,
there is no proof a 'Nun of Belley' even existed. (Click here for more on the 'Nun of Belley' predictions').
In fact, the Nun of Lyelbe
'prophecies' contains one that sound like it was borrowed from the
'Nun of Belley'.
Lyelbe: “He will
choose his capital around noon. "
Belley: “The Great
Monarch will ascend the throne of his fathers, the throne is posed at
noon.”
We also have similar
descriptions the 'Nun of Belley' and 'Lyelbe' – that the Nun of
Belley was a young girl, and also that of Lyelbe. The dates are also
conveniently similar, the Nun of Belley starting her prophecies at
1810 and ending sometime in 1830. That of Lyelbe around the 1820 –
the young girl supposedly having entered a convent at 1823 or 1825,
and dying sometime in 1829.
Similar to the author of
the 'Belley' texts, Henry Dujardin, who first published the 'Nun of
Lyelbe' texts in 1840, (title: "L'oracle pour 1840 et les années suivantes"), says his sources are 'authentic', but does not offer a name or
where his sources come from. We have no name for the nun, or any
proof she even existed.
So, we have indications
that the 'prophecies of Lyelbe' are another fabrication based on
those of 'Belley', or a continuation thereof.
As a result, these
prophecies are not included in the Timeline.
